TOPIC:

Time For a Flag wrote: 1700 for a bottom of the table clash between these two. When you see crowds of 800 @ EF v EP the comp is crying out for these two clubs to get their shit together.

Well said.

Oh no Jules, might be a fine coming your way mentioning how great our fans are in the Pig Pen. Constable Care will be talking to you.

800 C v SF
1200 WP v Peel
1620 EF v Subi
1700 P v SD

SD and Perth on the bottom of the ladder gets a bigger crowd then the rest.

This must tell the WAFC to stop looking after Peel, EP and Subi (you guys have had far too much fro the arrangement at Subi oval)

And start looking after Perth and SD

Some how Subi got the Good Friday game as well. This wont matter so much going forward as the AFL will plain this day but what was the thinking???

Time For a Flag wrote: 800 C v SF
1200 WP v Peel
1620 EF v Subi
1700 P v SD

SD and Perth on the bottom of the ladder gets a bigger crowd then the rest.

This must tell the WAFC to stop looking after Peel, EP and Subi (you guys have had far too much fro the arrangement at Subi oval)

And start looking after Perth and SD

What a loada crap. Why should you be looked after...you do sfa?

Bazza - try every once and a while to make your message clear.

What i am trying to say is that EP Peel and Subi get looked after disproportionally and unfortunately this hasn't helped them garner any more support.

Perth and Swans don't get much help but get better number than everyone if we take out

Foundation day derby (EF v SF)
Good friday (Subi)
International day (WP) A fantastic idea by West Perth btw and I am not suggesting they get less help

Time For a Flag wrote: 800 C v SF
1200 WP v Peel
1620 EF v Subi
1700 P v SD

SD and Perth on the bottom of the ladder gets a bigger crowd then the rest.

This must tell the WAFC to stop looking after Peel, EP and Subi (you guys have had far too much fro the arrangement at Subi oval)

And start looking after Perth and SD

Congratulations to Perth on winning all three games today.

TFAF the WAFC taking steps to look after the WAFL competition is about as likely as the umpires following one of their parts of their charter which concerns their duty of care to all players at all times. In the games at Lathlain Park Oval today we say two incidents which just demonstrated how little they care about the welfare of the players. In the first incident in the colts' match a Swans' player and a Perth player clash. Even though the Perth player was within 5 metres of the action and the fact that he wasn't moving at all none of the umpires officiating thought that there was any need to stop the match and determine the severity of the player's injury. The second incident occurred in the league match and again the umpires didn't demonstrate any concern for the players involved. Further when the stretcher was brought onto the field the player in question walked off the oval. My understanding is that once a stretcher has been brought onto the ground then the play must be stopped and the player carried off on the stretcher.

Time For a Flag wrote: Bazza - try every once and a while to make your message clear.

What i am trying to say is that EP Peel and Subi get looked after disproportionally and unfortunately this hasn't helped them garner any more support.

Perth and Swans don't get much help but get better number than everyone if we take out

Foundation day derby (EF v SF)
Good friday (Subi)
International day (WP) A fantastic idea by West Perth btw and I am not suggesting they get less help

So what special help does sf or ef or claremont get? Or maybe wp..? Getnover yourself stop blaming others for perths on and off field failures...overall you attendanes are poor, ef knocked off subi today, thats what counts.

Good effort today by the boys.
Still a lot of easy turnovers, but could not fault their effort.
Garstone is a revelation to me, needs to be nurtured.
Still skinny but does seem to be developing.
Jones needs ot cut out his bad disposal, and Jacobs has come back a better player I reckon.
Liked Angus' game and Latch continues to improve.
I think we can win some more games before years end.
Can't expect anymore than having a go.
Well done guys, hope enjoyed singing the song.
You could sing it most weeks you know if you wanted to.

They did enjoy the song in front of Channel 7 cameras DF.
Garstone was a very good Colts player but has taken a bit of time to adapt to senior footy. I have viewed him as a somewhat lazy player but yesterday he had a breakout game and showed some glimpses of his potential. Not many players can give Ames problems but Sam did yesterday.
Latch has taken his game to new levels IMO and has become very reliable. Combines well with Belly.
Sinclair had a very good game and appears back to his best form.
Jones does tend to turn the ball over a bit but 47 possessions. He gets to where the ball is and he is influential.
Angus is doing great. 44 hitouts, 18 possessions including 6 marks and 2 goals. He is working well on the ball and around the ground.

Time For a Flag wrote: 800 C v SF
1200 WP v Peel
1620 EF v Subi
1700 P v SD

SD and Perth on the bottom of the ladder gets a bigger crowd then the rest.

This must tell the WAFC to stop looking after Peel, EP and Subi (you guys have had far too much fro the arrangement at Subi oval)

And start looking after Perth and SD

I'd be staggered if there were 1700 there yesterday! That figure must include players,officials and staff!