TOPIC:

anchorman wrote:

Bazza wrote:

58shark wrote:

anchorman wrote: So Multi, the AFL hater. AFL despiser, you actually are confessing to sitting and watching the Derby!!!!!! Shame on you.

I don't know why you keep baiting old s&s anchor - he's just a very, very sad old man. Tell me the last time he actually wrote ANYTHING positive?? Always glass half empty.
Anyway, I just read your summation of the Derby. One thing I do agree with you is that Hill probably wasn't BOG. I thought Sandi did better job and it was done under adversity.

Heres something positive you old wanker south finished on top of your mob of cocksuckers, shove that up your arse n smoke it.

Such a childish response Multi. I would have expected better than that...... even from you.

That wound the old sucker up

Leather Stops wrote:

Bazza wrote: 2 weeks is an absolute disgrace, they cannot be serious, talk of an afl appeal.

Should have been minimum of FOUR weeks, foul act.

I would of thought lowest in the books

Lucky it wasnt a copper he bit, he would be looking at 6 months mandatory time in the can.