Notice: Undefined variable: ub in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 53

Notice: Undefined variable: ub in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 65

Deprecated: strripos(): Non-string needles will be interpreted as strings in the future. Use an explicit chr() call to preserve the current behavior in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 65
Welcome, Member
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC:

Distribution of revenue - preliminary final 8 years 7 months ago #79844

  • Tiger of old
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 1700
  • Thank you received: 230

UNKA2 wrote:

58shark wrote: So what you are saying swan is that from now on, every person that walks through the gate states his club preference so that at each game, the gate takings are spread evenly? OK, so EF v SD at bogan oval - gate is 5000. There's 2500 EF supporters, so they get 50% of the gate takings? FFS mate, you've lost any sense of reality.


I think swan42 is suffering from post Hastie blues. The swing didnt match the roundabout eh Swan?.


Take it to a politics online forum mr speaker this is for footy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Distribution of revenue - preliminary final 8 years 7 months ago #79846

  • UNKA2
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 1800
  • Thank you received: 116

Tiger of old wrote:

UNKA2 wrote:

58shark wrote: So what you are saying swan is that from now on, every person that walks through the gate states his club preference so that at each game, the gate takings are spread evenly? OK, so EF v SD at bogan oval - gate is 5000. There's 2500 EF supporters, so they get 50% of the gate takings? FFS mate, you've lost any sense of reality.


I think swan42 is suffering from post Hastie blues. The swing didnt match the roundabout eh Swan?.


Take it to a politics online forum mr speaker this is for footy


Its a joke, bit of light heartedness... chill a bit TOO eh

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Distribution of revenue - preliminary final 8 years 7 months ago #79875

  • swan42
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor

58shark wrote: So what you are saying swan is that from now on, every person that walks through the gate states his club preference so that at each game, the gate takings are spread evenly? OK, so EF v SD at bogan oval - gate is 5000. There's 2500 EF supporters, so they get 50% of the gate takings? FFS mate, you've lost any sense of reality.


58s what a complete and utter non sequitur.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Distribution of revenue - preliminary final 8 years 7 months ago #79876

  • swan42
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor

UNKA2 wrote:

58shark wrote: So what you are saying swan is that from now on, every person that walks through the gate states his club preference so that at each game, the gate takings are spread evenly? OK, so EF v SD at bogan oval - gate is 5000. There's 2500 EF supporters, so they get 50% of the gate takings? FFS mate, you've lost any sense of reality.


I think swan42 is suffering from post Hastie blues. The swing didnt match the roundabout eh Swan?.


UNKA2 the swing yesterday WAS SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER than the normal swin at a by-election caused by a death of a sitting member.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Distribution of revenue - preliminary final 8 years 7 months ago #79883

  • Custodian
  • Custodian's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 919
  • Thank you received: 76
To be sure! To be sure! We will need to wait until all votes are counted but the swing (two party preferred) currently stands at 6.42%. Historically the average swing in Federal by-elections between 1949 and 2014, resulting from the death of a sitting member is 2.5% (two party preferred). Nevertheless a win is a win!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by Custodian.

Distribution of revenue - preliminary final 8 years 7 months ago #79906

  • Freezin
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 9307
  • Thank you received: 925
fingers crossed SDFC get a good pay day next week with 50000 of their fans descending to Patersons for the two earlier GFs......or will WP and Subi share that between them....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Distribution of revenue - preliminary final 8 years 7 months ago #79909

  • Dirty Weekender
  • Dirty Weekender's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 2484
  • Thank you received: 374

Freezin wrote: fingers crossed SDFC get a good pay day next week with 50000 of their fans descending to Patersons for the two earlier GFs......or will WP and Subi share that between them....



Haha nice one freeze but at $25 per head I reckon we'll only get 40000 down there :P

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Distribution of revenue - preliminary final 8 years 7 months ago #79947

  • westaussieguy
  • westaussieguy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 4040
  • Thank you received: 357
Did I read someone say the costs of 8 dollars for a cup of canned beer!? Surely not 8 $ for a cup?
The entry price does seem steep considering only one Wafl team was playing. Would imagine the same pricing applies for the Grand Final? With 2 Wafl teams in the big match, the pricing does seem fairer but still going to be a huge burden on families.
One would hope the pricing for next years finals (and beyond) is not as excessive!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Distribution of revenue - preliminary final 8 years 7 months ago #79950

  • Dirty Weekender
  • Dirty Weekender's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 2484
  • Thank you received: 374
At one stage they were pouring out of king browns wag....I guess they turned to cans after they ran out of KB's.... $8 for a plastic cup full of Carlton draught is taking the piss I agree but in thinking about it things could have been worse...at the WACA they make you drink midstrength.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Distribution of revenue - preliminary final 8 years 7 months ago #79958

  • BC
  • BC's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 8997
  • Thank you received: 1553

swan42 wrote: It was an interesting read in today's West written by Joh Townsend re the distribution of the gate takings for tomorrow's preliminary final at Joondalup. According to the article 70% goes to West Perth and 30% goes to "East Perth". It is also reported in the article that "West Perth expect that at least 1,000 Swan Districts fans will attend the colts (sic) and reserves (sic) preliminary finals."

The two crowd figures suggested for tomorrow are 10,000 and 7,000. Further the article indicates that with a crowd of 7,000 the net gate revenue would be about $140,000. With that scenario why does Swans get nothing from providing one-seventh of the total crowd?


this is fascinating stuff 42...how would you determine how much each club received? Subi had its reserves side playing so would it get the same as say WP, or FART or WART who also had one side playing on the day? and would your beloved bogans get twice as much because they had two sides playing? this is fantastic...I can't wait to see how it would all work... :silly:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Search

Keyword

Who's Online?

We have 252 guests and 2 members online

  • DD
  • Kick it long

Newest Footy Recruits

  • Masondusa
  • Robertgew
  • Keithwadia
  • Lost WAFL
  • Duncs1977