TOPIC:

swan42 wrote:

BC wrote: what in the hell are you on about 42?...the suggestion Subi would chase Stewart came from one of your clowns on an earlier thread...tongue in cheek I'd hope....and what would you like Subi supporters do about the club's dominance? stop supporting them because they're too successful? vote the board and CEO out because we've won too many flags in recent times? get a grip on reality and not on your Johnson...

BC I thought better of you; I thought you were able to have a discussion without resorting to personal abuse. With respect to what you as a Subiaco supporter could do; you could speak to your directors and discuss whether it is healthy to be as dominant as you currently are or perhaps rather than chasing the cream of the other clubs' payers that money would be better expended on your junior development? With respect to my comments about Taryce Stewart I did try to explain that I didn't want it to be seen as a specific example but rather as a symbol of what Subiaco has done in the past.

You're still talking rubbish on both counts...I can imagine the reception a supporter would get talking to the club and telling them not be so successful because it's hurting the WAFL. That's the job of the WAFC not the faithful. As for Stewart, you made no mention of it being a symbol...you referred to it as an example of Subi's "contempt for the future of the competition" which is nonsense....and from what I've seen he wouldn't get a game anyway so why would we be chasing him?

BC wrote:

swan42 wrote:

BC wrote: what in the hell are you on about 42?...the suggestion Subi would chase Stewart came from one of your clowns on an earlier thread...tongue in cheek I'd hope....and what would you like Subi supporters do about the club's dominance? stop supporting them because they're too successful? vote the board and CEO out because we've won too many flags in recent times? get a grip on reality and not on your Johnson...

BC I thought better of you; I thought you were able to have a discussion without resorting to personal abuse. With respect to what you as a Subiaco supporter could do; you could speak to your directors and discuss whether it is healthy to be as dominant as you currently are or perhaps rather than chasing the cream of the other clubs' payers that money would be better expended on your junior development? With respect to my comments about Taryce Stewart I did try to explain that I didn't want it to be seen as a specific example but rather as a symbol of what Subiaco has done in the past.

You're still talking rubbish on both counts...I can imagine the reception a supporter would get talking to the club and telling them not be so successful because it's hurting the WAFL. That's the job of the WAFC not the faithful. As for Stewart, you made no mention of it being a symbol...you referred to it as an example of Subi's "contempt for the future of the competition" which is nonsense....and from what I've seen he wouldn't get a game anyway so why would we be chasing him?

That didn't stop you from recruiting the likes of-
Nelson, Daniels, Matera, Fimmano, Menegola, Perkins, Parry et al BC who will all be kicking the dew off the grass tomorrow morning!!

BC wrote:

swan42 wrote:

BC wrote: what in the hell are you on about 42?...the suggestion Subi would chase Stewart came from one of your clowns on an earlier thread...tongue in cheek I'd hope....and what would you like Subi supporters do about the club's dominance? stop supporting them because they're too successful? vote the board and CEO out because we've won too many flags in recent times? get a grip on reality and not on your Johnson...

BC I thought better of you; I thought you were able to have a discussion without resorting to personal abuse. With respect to what you as a Subiaco supporter could do; you could speak to your directors and discuss whether it is healthy to be as dominant as you currently are or perhaps rather than chasing the cream of the other clubs' payers that money would be better expended on your junior development? With respect to my comments about Taryce Stewart I did try to explain that I didn't want it to be seen as a specific example but rather as a symbol of what Subiaco has done in the past.

You're still talking rubbish on both counts...I can imagine the reception a supporter would get talking to the club and telling them not be so successful because it's hurting the WAFL. That's the job of the WAFC not the faithful. As for Stewart, you made no mention of it being a symbol...you referred to it as an example of Subi's "contempt for the future of the competition" which is nonsense....and from what I've seen he wouldn't get a game anyway so why would we be chasing him?

BC all I have to say is that I am not sure how much Subiaco will like it when there is no WAFL for Subiaco to dominate.

Beasley Hutton wrote:

BC wrote:

swan42 wrote:

BC wrote: what in the hell are you on about 42?...the suggestion Subi would chase Stewart came from one of your clowns on an earlier thread...tongue in cheek I'd hope....and what would you like Subi supporters do about the club's dominance? stop supporting them because they're too successful? vote the board and CEO out because we've won too many flags in recent times? get a grip on reality and not on your Johnson...

BC I thought better of you; I thought you were able to have a discussion without resorting to personal abuse. With respect to what you as a Subiaco supporter could do; you could speak to your directors and discuss whether it is healthy to be as dominant as you currently are or perhaps rather than chasing the cream of the other clubs' payers that money would be better expended on your junior development? With respect to my comments about Taryce Stewart I did try to explain that I didn't want it to be seen as a specific example but rather as a symbol of what Subiaco has done in the past.

You're still talking rubbish on both counts...I can imagine the reception a supporter would get talking to the club and telling them not be so successful because it's hurting the WAFL. That's the job of the WAFC not the faithful. As for Stewart, you made no mention of it being a symbol...you referred to it as an example of Subi's "contempt for the future of the competition" which is nonsense....and from what I've seen he wouldn't get a game anyway so why would we be chasing him?

That didn't stop you from recruiting the likes of-
Nelson, Daniels, Matera, Fimmano, Menegola, Perkins, Parry et al BC who will all be kicking the dew off the grass tomorrow morning!!

yes you're quite correct...but they were playing ressies at their respective clubs anyway so where's the damage? who have Subi recruited in recent times from another club who was an A grader to the detriment of that club? I'd suggest none.

BC wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote:

BC wrote:

swan42 wrote:

BC wrote: what in the hell are you on about 42?...the suggestion Subi would chase Stewart came from one of your clowns on an earlier thread...tongue in cheek I'd hope....and what would you like Subi supporters do about the club's dominance? stop supporting them because they're too successful? vote the board and CEO out because we've won too many flags in recent times? get a grip on reality and not on your Johnson...

BC I thought better of you; I thought you were able to have a discussion without resorting to personal abuse. With respect to what you as a Subiaco supporter could do; you could speak to your directors and discuss whether it is healthy to be as dominant as you currently are or perhaps rather than chasing the cream of the other clubs' payers that money would be better expended on your junior development? With respect to my comments about Taryce Stewart I did try to explain that I didn't want it to be seen as a specific example but rather as a symbol of what Subiaco has done in the past.

You're still talking rubbish on both counts...I can imagine the reception a supporter would get talking to the club and telling them not be so successful because it's hurting the WAFL. That's the job of the WAFC not the faithful. As for Stewart, you made no mention of it being a symbol...you referred to it as an example of Subi's "contempt for the future of the competition" which is nonsense....and from what I've seen he wouldn't get a game anyway so why would we be chasing him?

That didn't stop you from recruiting the likes of-
Nelson, Daniels, Matera, Fimmano, Menegola, Perkins, Parry et al BC who will all be kicking the dew off the grass tomorrow morning!!

yes you're quite correct...but they were playing ressies at their respective clubs anyway so where's the damage? who have Subi recruited in recent times from another club who was an A grader to the detriment of that club? I'd suggest none.

Are yu saying that Twomey and Robbo would not have been in Swans's best 22?

Peter North wrote: I'm guessing he's a Subi supporter myself BH, ironic his avatar states 4 out of 5 ain't bad and has Subi as the odd one out lol, i lol at the clowns on here all five of them that are going to support Subi in the GF they think they speak for all WAFL supporters.

Guessing "he" - be careful, can't be sexist these days!
"Subi supporter" - I try to be impartial and I don't talk about my team but I don't go for EP/Peel. Your comments on Subi are relevant and concerning but I'm only really focused on the current alignment & EP/Peel. Maybe I'll have to consider previous alignments and the rich Subi.

swan42 wrote:

BC wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote:

BC wrote:

swan42 wrote:

BC wrote: what in the hell are you on about 42?...the suggestion Subi would chase Stewart came from one of your clowns on an earlier thread...tongue in cheek I'd hope....and what would you like Subi supporters do about the club's dominance? stop supporting them because they're too successful? vote the board and CEO out because we've won too many flags in recent times? get a grip on reality and not on your Johnson...

BC I thought better of you; I thought you were able to have a discussion without resorting to personal abuse. With respect to what you as a Subiaco supporter could do; you could speak to your directors and discuss whether it is healthy to be as dominant as you currently are or perhaps rather than chasing the cream of the other clubs' payers that money would be better expended on your junior development? With respect to my comments about Taryce Stewart I did try to explain that I didn't want it to be seen as a specific example but rather as a symbol of what Subiaco has done in the past.

You're still talking rubbish on both counts...I can imagine the reception a supporter would get talking to the club and telling them not be so successful because it's hurting the WAFL. That's the job of the WAFC not the faithful. As for Stewart, you made no mention of it being a symbol...you referred to it as an example of Subi's "contempt for the future of the competition" which is nonsense....and from what I've seen he wouldn't get a game anyway so why would we be chasing him?

That didn't stop you from recruiting the likes of-
Nelson, Daniels, Matera, Fimmano, Menegola, Perkins, Parry et al BC who will all be kicking the dew off the grass tomorrow morning!!

yes you're quite correct...but they were playing ressies at their respective clubs anyway so where's the damage? who have Subi recruited in recent times from another club who was an A grader to the detriment of that club? I'd suggest none.

Are yu saying that Twomey and Robbo would not have been in Swans's best 22?

Twomey yes but Robbo had left Swans after the pre-season so was fair game.

BC wrote:

swan42 wrote:

BC wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote:

BC wrote:

swan42 wrote:

BC wrote: what in the hell are you on about 42?...the suggestion Subi would chase Stewart came from one of your clowns on an earlier thread...tongue in cheek I'd hope....and what would you like Subi supporters do about the club's dominance? stop supporting them because they're too successful? vote the board and CEO out because we've won too many flags in recent times? get a grip on reality and not on your Johnson...

BC I thought better of you; I thought you were able to have a discussion without resorting to personal abuse. With respect to what you as a Subiaco supporter could do; you could speak to your directors and discuss whether it is healthy to be as dominant as you currently are or perhaps rather than chasing the cream of the other clubs' payers that money would be better expended on your junior development? With respect to my comments about Taryce Stewart I did try to explain that I didn't want it to be seen as a specific example but rather as a symbol of what Subiaco has done in the past.

You're still talking rubbish on both counts...I can imagine the reception a supporter would get talking to the club and telling them not be so successful because it's hurting the WAFL. That's the job of the WAFC not the faithful. As for Stewart, you made no mention of it being a symbol...you referred to it as an example of Subi's "contempt for the future of the competition" which is nonsense....and from what I've seen he wouldn't get a game anyway so why would we be chasing him?

That didn't stop you from recruiting the likes of-
Nelson, Daniels, Matera, Fimmano, Menegola, Perkins, Parry et al BC who will all be kicking the dew off the grass tomorrow morning!!

yes you're quite correct...but they were playing ressies at their respective clubs anyway so where's the damage? who have Subi recruited in recent times from another club who was an A grader to the detriment of that club? I'd suggest none.

Are yu saying that Twomey and Robbo would not have been in Swans's best 22?

Twomey yes but Robbo had left Swans after the pre-season so was fair game.

Really BC? Please explain what is between the pre-season and the season? He went directly from doing the pre-season at Swans to Subiaco.

Grassy wrote: Doesn't seem to matter what explanation you give the Swans boys,BC..........

It's a conspiracy I tell ya.

Grassy wrote: So tell the Swans boys that,you bloody great troll.

Make sure you wear your Subi gear tomorrow and save the WAFL lol.