TOPIC:

Freezin wrote: Thought you were in cahoots with Hodyl.....drop him a line asking Pete why SD didn't venture out of the sheds after half time, in a game they were trailing by 5 points, against the top team, who they had kept goalless that quarter, with a finals berth still on the offering.....surely Pete could enlighten you mate.

Your comments are getting even more puerile. We should not have been playing Subiaco today at all; as I very forcefully put to a director of Swans post the East Freo last Saturday. The WAFL has become nothing but a complete and utter farce.

swan42 wrote:

Freezin wrote: Thought you were in cahoots with Hodyl.....drop him a line asking Pete why SD didn't venture out of the sheds after half time, in a game they were trailing by 5 points, against the top team, who they had kept goalless that quarter, with a finals berth still on the offering.....surely Pete could enlighten you mate.

Your comments are getting even more puerile. We should not have been playing Subiaco today at all; as I very forcefully put to a director of Swans post the East Freo last Saturday. The WAFL has become nothing but a complete and utter farce.

After you put it to him forcefully (very) I'm interested in what he said he was going to do about it?

ooollllrrrrrry2 wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Freezin wrote: Thought you were in cahoots with Hodyl.....drop him a line asking Pete why SD didn't venture out of the sheds after half time, in a game they were trailing by 5 points, against the top team, who they had kept goalless that quarter, with a finals berth still on the offering.....surely Pete could enlighten you mate.

Your comments are getting even more puerile. We should not have been playing Subiaco today at all; as I very forcefully put to a director of Swans post the East Freo last Saturday. The WAFL has become nothing but a complete and utter farce.

After you put it to him forcefully (very) I'm interested in what he said he was going to do about it?

It couldn't be less than what the WAFC are doing to try to save the WAFL.

Why shouldn't of SD played Subi today 42?..is it because this is SD 3rd match with Subi?..You guys played finals last year, finished 4th after the H&A games....Isn't custom for last year finalists to play each other more the next year than the non finalists?

swan42 wrote:

ooollllrrrrrry2 wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Freezin wrote: Thought you were in cahoots with Hodyl.....drop him a line asking Pete why SD didn't venture out of the sheds after half time, in a game they were trailing by 5 points, against the top team, who they had kept goalless that quarter, with a finals berth still on the offering.....surely Pete could enlighten you mate.

Your comments are getting even more puerile. We should not have been playing Subiaco today at all; as I very forcefully put to a director of Swans post the East Freo last Saturday. The WAFL has become nothing but a complete and utter farce.

After you put it to him forcefully (very) I'm interested in what he said he was going to do about it?

It couldn't be less than what the WAFC are doing to try to save the WAFL.

I thought you referred to forcefully (very) telling the director you shouldn't have been playing Subiaco today at all (although I'm also interested in him saving the WAFL too) and whether he responded on what he would do about said fixturing?

Freezin wrote: Why shouldn't of SD played Subi today 42?..is it because this is SD 3rd match with Subi?..You guys played finals last year, finished 4th after the H&A games....Isn't custom for last year finalists to play each other more the next year than the non finalists?

freezin specifically, unequivocally and unambiguously Gavin Taylor said the extra two games would be between traditional rivals and the other game would be between teams that finished in the same third. Subiaco finished first and Swans finished 4th. So that would not fit into what Gavin Taylor said would happen. So the only conclusions one could reasonably come up with is that either Gavin Taylor deliberately LIED or is completely INCOMPETENT.

Well he can't be too incompetent mate, because the last 3 games have sides from 4-7 playing 8 pointers....good for the comp regardless of the inevitable end result......

Freezin wrote: Well he can't be too incompetent mate, because the last 3 games have sides from 4-7 playing 8 pointers....good for the comp regardless of the inevitable end result......

One club is averaging more than 2,000 spectators in 2018 and in 2012 there were 7.

Freezin wrote: Why shouldn't of SD played Subi today 42?..is it because this is SD 3rd match with Subi?..You guys played finals last year, finished 4th after the H&A games....Isn't custom for last year finalists to play each other more the next year than the non finalists?

Freeze,

Souths finished 2nd and only played $ubi twice ???

Leedy wrote:

Freezin wrote: Why shouldn't of SD played Subi today 42?..is it because this is SD 3rd match with Subi?..You guys played finals last year, finished 4th after the H&A games....Isn't custom for last year finalists to play each other more the next year than the non finalists?

Freeze,

Souths finished 2nd and only played $ubi twice ???

yeah hear what you are saying Leedy....but don't forget mate, SF will have three tough games v EF this year....swings in roundabouts....