TOPIC:

BC wrote: mate...I think there were far more important issues that determined which way people were going to vote at the last election. sure the Libs and Labor had differing policies on gay marriage which set them apart but I wouldn't think most people thought long and hard about this issue before casting their vote. given most punters either don't give a stuff or generally accept that equality in marriage is a reasonable thing and also the outrageous cost of a plebiscite I think it would be reasonable for Turnbull to roll over on this one.

Should of voted for Bill mate,

Bazza wrote:

BC wrote: mate...I think there were far more important issues that determined which way people were going to vote at the last election. sure the Libs and Labor had differing policies on gay marriage which set them apart but I wouldn't think most people thought long and hard about this issue before casting their vote. given most punters either don't give a stuff or generally accept that equality in marriage is a reasonable thing and also the outrageous cost of a plebiscite I think it would be reasonable for Turnbull to roll over on this one.

Should of voted for Bill mate,

wash your mouth out !!!!

Mind you we almost have him with Laborlite under Turnbull.

Swan 42: The country would work better if we adoptted the Salisbury Convention, anything openly put to the electorate should be waved through the Senate. The fact that they are electted should make no difference, it is principally the the House of Rewiew. We should keep in mind that Shorten once supported a plebescite.