TOPIC:

MarkOlsen wrote: I reckon McBob should focus his energies on who is telling all these kids to go and smoke ice..

sort that out first..

The Muslims did, i saw them

But seriously that is a whole other issue. The ICE problem is born from a couple of place IMO :
-Weak parenting, created a generation of entitled over-privileged brats, who were never told no.
-Piss weak legal system that is both too cumbersome to allow any efficient prosecutions and piss poor minimum sentencing for suppliers.

swan42 wrote:

MarkOlsen wrote: I reckon McBob should focus his energies on who is telling all these kids to go and smoke ice..

sort that out first..

MO he is too busy salivating over D Trump's, oh so meaningful, words that he is currently dribbling.

Salivating is not a strong enough word

Mcbob wrote:

MarkOlsen wrote: I reckon McBob should focus his energies on who is telling all these kids to go and smoke ice..

sort that out first..

The Muslims did, i saw them

But seriously that is a whole other issue. The ICE problem is born from a couple of place IMO :
-Weak parenting, created a generation of entitled over-privileged brats, who were never told no.
-Piss weak legal system that is both too cumbersome to allow any efficient prosecutions and piss poor minimum sentencing for suppliers.

Give me strength. McBob or D Trump: what a choice.

What an orator? Mind-numbing dribble.

ASX down 0.5 %.

US$ down against the yen.

Sky business (602) reaction:

lack of detail. Looked like a president. Note Looked not sounded.

swan42 wrote:

Senior Seagull wrote: I don't give a fat rats backside what anyone wears as long as I can see their faces.
I cant walk into a servo or a bank with a full face helmet on because they cant identify me if I was there to rob the joint or take off without paying for the petrol, so let anyone wear whatever they like just make it so they have to have their full face visible, if only for security reasons.

Lets face it there's some really rough lookin' heads around that should get covered up so the children don't get frightened especially up at any Swans home game, but for security sake the face should be visible.

SS exactly how many bank robberies have occurred in Australia in the past 2 years by someone wearing such clothing?

Also, I trust you are also supporting the banning of people wearing Father Christmas costumes given the potential it could be used in a terrorist act?

Well S42 I can still see father Christmas's face even with a big beard so if Father Christmas performed a terrorist attack we could still see his face, simple really. The fact is the full covered face is not a religious requirement it's a choice ... well more likely a demand by the husband/father.
ps: I like that you use the traditional term Father Christmas and not the sepo terminology of Santa.

Senior Seagull wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Senior Seagull wrote: I don't give a fat rats backside what anyone wears as long as I can see their faces.
I cant walk into a servo or a bank with a full face helmet on because they cant identify me if I was there to rob the joint or take off without paying for the petrol, so let anyone wear whatever they like just make it so they have to have their full face visible, if only for security reasons.

Lets face it there's some really rough lookin' heads around that should get covered up so the children don't get frightened especially up at any Swans home game, but for security sake the face should be visible.

SS exactly how many bank robberies have occurred in Australia in the past 2 years by someone wearing such clothing?

Also, I trust you are also supporting the banning of people wearing Father Christmas costumes given the potential it could be used in a terrorist act?

Well S42 I can still see father Christmas's face even with a big beard so if Father Christmas performed a terrorist attack we could still see his face, simple really. The fact is the full covered face is not a religious requirement it's a choice ... well more likely a demand by the husband/father.
ps: I like that you use the traditional term Father Christmas and not the sepo terminology of Santa.

But such an attack HAS HAPPENED.

swan42 wrote:

Senior Seagull wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Senior Seagull wrote: I don't give a fat rats backside what anyone wears as long as I can see their faces.
I cant walk into a servo or a bank with a full face helmet on because they cant identify me if I was there to rob the joint or take off without paying for the petrol, so let anyone wear whatever they like just make it so they have to have their full face visible, if only for security reasons.

Lets face it there's some really rough lookin' heads around that should get covered up so the children don't get frightened especially up at any Swans home game, but for security sake the face should be visible.

SS exactly how many bank robberies have occurred in Australia in the past 2 years by someone wearing such clothing?

Also, I trust you are also supporting the banning of people wearing Father Christmas costumes given the potential it could be used in a terrorist act?

Well S42 I can still see father Christmas's face even with a big beard so if Father Christmas performed a terrorist attack we could still see his face, simple really. The fact is the full covered face is not a religious requirement it's a choice ... well more likely a demand by the husband/father.
ps: I like that you use the traditional term Father Christmas and not the sepo terminology of Santa.

But such an attack HAS HAPPENED.

Yup Santas have been blowing each other up for hundreds of years now. Get real

MarkOlsen wrote: I reckon McBob should focus his energies on who is telling all these kids to go and smoke ice..

sort that out first..

Methinks McBob could be a reincarnation of a previous banned member?

swan42 wrote:

Senior Seagull wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Senior Seagull wrote: I don't give a fat rats backside what anyone wears as long as I can see their faces.
I cant walk into a servo or a bank with a full face helmet on because they cant identify me if I was there to rob the joint or take off without paying for the petrol, so let anyone wear whatever they like just make it so they have to have their full face visible, if only for security reasons.

Lets face it there's some really rough lookin' heads around that should get covered up so the children don't get frightened especially up at any Swans home game, but for security sake the face should be visible.

SS exactly how many bank robberies have occurred in Australia in the past 2 years by someone wearing such clothing?

Also, I trust you are also supporting the banning of people wearing Father Christmas costumes given the potential it could be used in a terrorist act?

Well S42 I can still see father Christmas's face even with a big beard so if Father Christmas performed a terrorist attack we could still see his face, simple really. The fact is the full covered face is not a religious requirement it's a choice ... well more likely a demand by the husband/father.
ps: I like that you use the traditional term Father Christmas and not the sepo terminology of Santa.

But such an attack HAS HAPPENED.

Father Christmas will be a thing of the past anyway so we don't upset our non-Christian brethren. It's already happening in schools around the signing of carols so only a matter of time before it extends to other things. It's also just a matter of time before we're all forced to break for Ramadan to appease our looney left minority sympathisers.