TOPIC:

Listened to an interesting interview on 91.3 the other morning regarding how the Eagles seem to dominate the footy news. Years ago, the press would ring West Coast and Freo for availability to their players and coach. Every single Sunday morning the Eagles would have a player available for interview. They also asked for and got 3 sessions with the Eagles coach through the season. Freo refused these requests repeatably - never got one session. One week, the WA press got wind that Connolly was being interviewed by SEN in Victoria. Apparently, Freo wanted more Eastern states radio exposure. Naturally, the press here were fairly pissed and responded accordingly. They believe that after all these years the lean against Freo persists, hence the WCE media exposure. All pretty fanciful isn’t it? After all, what would Jack Cranshaw (?) and Glenn Mitchell know ??? You reap what you sow. Still, the whinging will persist.

Shark 58, Channel 7 and the West Australian are two of the major sponsors of the WCE (or seven west media if you prefer). Wouldn't be a big deal if there was an alternative newspaper in Perth but the West is the only one. You have a look at the footy coverage in the West Australian on any given monday morning and on virtually every occasion the Eagles are front and centre in the coverage. Understandable given the sponsorship but in a two team town it is a little unbalanced IMO.

mikeh wrote: Shark 58, Channel 7 and the West Australian are two of the major sponsors of the WCE (or seven west media if you prefer). Wouldn't be a big deal if there was an alternative newspaper in Perth but the West is the only one. You have a look at the footy coverage in the West Australian on any given monday morning and on virtually every occasion the Eagles are front and centre in the coverage. Understandable given the sponsorship but in a two team town it is a little unbalanced IMO.

Disagree somewhat mike. From what i have seen, West Coast get a good coverage one week, Then Freo the next. However, the point of my post was to show how the dorks set the rules with the media. They thought that getting Victorian coverage was more important than attending their own WA supporters. When someone of Glenn Mitchell’s standing still sounds peeved at the way our press was treated, then you really do have to listen.

58shark wrote:

mikeh wrote: Shark 58, Channel 7 and the West Australian are two of the major sponsors of the WCE (or seven west media if you prefer). Wouldn't be a big deal if there was an alternative newspaper in Perth but the West is the only one. You have a look at the footy coverage in the West Australian on any given monday morning and on virtually every occasion the Eagles are front and centre in the coverage. Understandable given the sponsorship but in a two team town it is a little unbalanced IMO.

Disagree somewhat mike. From what i have seen, West Coast get a good coverage one week, Then Freo the next. However, the point of my post was to show how the dorks set the rules with the media. They thought that getting Victorian coverage was more important than attending their own WA supporters. When someone of Glenn Mitchell’s standing still sounds peeved at the way our press was treated, then you really do have to listen.

Gary Stocks ring a bell? One has to be completely jaundiced to think that the Western Australian media is anything but WCE-centric.

WCE have a dominant ruckman in NicNat and Fremantle have a dominant ruckman in Sandilands. Would anyone like to guess the ratio of NicNat to Sandilands photos there have been in The West and the Sunday Times in 2018?

swan42 wrote:

58shark wrote:

mikeh wrote: Shark 58, Channel 7 and the West Australian are two of the major sponsors of the WCE (or seven west media if you prefer). Wouldn't be a big deal if there was an alternative newspaper in Perth but the West is the only one. You have a look at the footy coverage in the West Australian on any given monday morning and on virtually every occasion the Eagles are front and centre in the coverage. Understandable given the sponsorship but in a two team town it is a little unbalanced IMO.

Disagree somewhat mike. From what i have seen, West Coast get a good coverage one week, Then Freo the next. However, the point of my post was to show how the dorks set the rules with the media. They thought that getting Victorian coverage was more important than attending their own WA supporters. When someone of Glenn Mitchell’s standing still sounds peeved at the way our press was treated, then you really do have to listen.

Gary Stocks ring a bell? One has to be completely jaundiced to think that the Western Australian media is anything but WCE-centric.

WCE have a dominant ruckman in NicNat and Fremantle have a dominant ruckman in Sandilands. Would anyone like to guess the ratio of NicNat to Sandilands photos there have been in The West and the Sunday Times in 2018?

Do you think that part of the reason is because Nic has no problem engaging the press, but Sandilands prefers a very private life? Time to get out of your Swans anf Freo bubble and looking at the whole picture swan.

58shark wrote:

swan42 wrote:

58shark wrote:

mikeh wrote: Shark 58, Channel 7 and the West Australian are two of the major sponsors of the WCE (or seven west media if you prefer). Wouldn't be a big deal if there was an alternative newspaper in Perth but the West is the only one. You have a look at the footy coverage in the West Australian on any given monday morning and on virtually every occasion the Eagles are front and centre in the coverage. Understandable given the sponsorship but in a two team town it is a little unbalanced IMO.

Disagree somewhat mike. From what i have seen, West Coast get a good coverage one week, Then Freo the next. However, the point of my post was to show how the dorks set the rules with the media. They thought that getting Victorian coverage was more important than attending their own WA supporters. When someone of Glenn Mitchell’s standing still sounds peeved at the way our press was treated, then you really do have to listen.

Gary Stocks ring a bell? One has to be completely jaundiced to think that the Western Australian media is anything but WCE-centric.

WCE have a dominant ruckman in NicNat and Fremantle have a dominant ruckman in Sandilands. Would anyone like to guess the ratio of NicNat to Sandilands photos there have been in The West and the Sunday Times in 2018?

Do you think that part of the reason is because Nic has no problem engaging the press, but Sandilands prefers a very private life? Time to get out of your Swans anf Freo bubble and looking at the whole picture swan.

No I don't.

anchorman wrote: I have been told that a very very prominent WA based football commentator , now retired, had his nose put out of place by the fact that back in 1994 on the Dockers induction into the VFL/AFL.the Dockers didn't want him to be host of the night.Still haunts him me thinks.
The press here in WA is very very very WCE slanted.One would have to be blind Freddy or a blind one eye Waste Coat supporter not to see that.

Washington perhaps!!!!!

i reckon Freo might get their fair share of media now..

anchorman wrote: I have been told that a very very prominent WA based football commentator , now retired, had his nose put out of place by the fact that back in 1994 on the Dockers induction into the VFL/AFL.the Dockers didn't want him to be host of the night.Still haunts him me thinks.
The press here in WA is very very very WCE slanted.One would have to be blind Freddy or a blind one eye Waste Coat supporter not to see that.

So Glenn Mitchell didn’t know what he was talking about and you know better? I don’t think you would care what the facts are. You have become a bitter old man. I reckon you and swan could team up and do the pub rounds. You could call yourselves “Bitter and Twisted”.

It's pretty simple, I've been running the same line for years,...... Freo are a shit club. Have been for a very long underachieving time.

Why would the Media cover them?