TOPIC:

Todays west gave us some indication of who and how much the west coast can spend on their wafl team top up players.The one that will make some supporters happy is that they can recruit up to two players each from every wafl teamt who are outside the protected 40 list.I think they may be more competitive then what I assumed compared to the Adelaide crows.

chaddy22 wrote: Todays west gave us some indication of who and how much the west coast can spend on their wafl team top up players.The one that will make some supporters happy is that they can recruit up to two players each from every wafl teamt who are outside the protected 40 list.I think they may be more competitive then what I assumed compared to the Adelaide crows.

C22 why would anyone be surprised with what the contemptible WAFC does? So there are 22 players in a league game and 23 for the ressies; so the DEVILS INCARNATE can take two players that would be first selected in the league or reserves team.

I wouldn't be surprised if the WAFC allowed the two clubs linked with the two WA domiciled AFL clubs are allowed a mid-season draft pick.

The WAFC are held in greater contempt by me than Scott Morrison et al.

The bullies might be uncompetitive they reckon so wafc jumps into action to help. PFC has been uncompetitive for 40 years and the wafc could not care less.

Stand the Test wrote: The bullies might be uncompetitive they reckon so wafc jumps into action to help. PFC has been uncompetitive for 40 years and the wafc could not care less.

STT the question you need to ask and respond to is WHY have PFC been so noncompetitive over the journey when other clubs have gone through cycles ( except Subi in the past ten years).

Could not agree more Grump, my issue is wafc isn't interested in why. They organised a paper for us last year. They made us pay for it and it said we should not recruit and rely on talent in our zone. FMD.