TOPIC:

I take it from the news tonight Nic Nat may play for the Eagles.

It is only Footscray so wouldn't hurt to nease him back at the top level with other easy games to come.

Beasley Hutton wrote: Freeze totally off topic I know but have they fixed up Jade Stadium (or whatever it is called these days) from the damage the earthquake caused to the ground? Having glanced through the channels on fox sports the other day i noticed the Crusaders were playing at another ground other than Jade.

BH, Jade is still standing, looks untouched TBH, but is structurally unsafe, thus needs to be pulled down. The kiwis make me giggle really, CHCH had a shed load of folks homeless, no toilets etc etc in a shed load of neighbourhoods, no money available supposedly, but enough apparently to build another stadium, although smaller and make shift, to enable their beloved Crusaders to play at home instead of other Canterbury towns in Nelson or Timaru, where decent enough stadiums already exist....The Crusaders are called the Canterbury Crusaders not the Christchurch Crusaders!.....

souds like thngs are tuning around for the weagles, glaas gets off, nik nat back , beat the bulldogs this weekend.

NicNat is tied to the WAFL club Swan Districts and as such he can only play for Swans or the bottom placed Reserves' team. He is ineligible to play for any other league team than Swan Districts i 2013.

The umpire who pinged Lammie for a throw was wrong according to the Umpires' Department.

swan42 wrote: NicNat is tied to the WAFL club Swan Districts and as such he can only play for Swans or the bottom placed Reserves' team. He is ineligible to play for any other league team than Swan Districts i 2013.

The umpire who pinged Lammie for a throw was wrong according to the Umpires' Department.

so what will you do if he gets told to go to east perth put on a jumper and east perth says come play for us

complain to the WAFC???

as if they will give a shit about SDFC.

Well firstly I would hope that NicNat would refuse. Secondly, if he did play for the team formerly knownn as East Perth, the team playing them should put in protest as an ineligible player played for the team formerly known as East Perth.

Thirdly, the entire WAFC should resign post haste.

swan42 wrote: Well firstly I would hope that NicNat would refuse. Secondly, if he did play for the team formerly knownn as East Perth, the team playing them should put in protest as an ineligible player played for the team formerly known as East Perth.

Thirdly, the entire WAFC should resign post haste.

In other words sweet FA

It will be about as succesfull as the mass protests by the so called all powerful (read rollover) WAFL clubs that prevented the host club arrangements lol...

Which WAFL club's matches do you attend and are you happy with the host club situation?

swan42 wrote: Which WAFL club's matches do you attend and are you happy with the host club situation?

Obviously SF ones

and NO I am dead against the Host club, I detest the AFL machine and both local monsters for their destruction of the state leage with is now a powerless puppet of the two franchises.

Well it has taken a while but at least we havve consensus with respect to detesting the host club scenario.