TOPIC:

In 2016 total attendance in Round 1 was 7102 and the total attendance for Round 1 in 2017 was 7110.

Custodian wrote: In 2016 total attendance in Round 1 was 7102 and the total attendance for Round 1 in 2017 was 7110.

Yeah , last year was crap as well.

Grassy wrote: And McHenry and Co will pat themselves on the back for it.

Christ,give us strength!!!!!

Once they release the Boston Report,the WAFL Presidents should launch their Motion of NO CONFIDENCE in the Bastards!

I don't think anyones patting anyone on any backs - nobody cares anymore,

Where does the motion of no confidence get them Grassy?

The same place as the united front to stop the alignment,? that worked well didn't it.

Whether you or I like it or not more change is on the way.

Bazza wrote:

Grassy wrote: And McHenry and Co will pat themselves on the back for it.

Christ,give us strength!!!!!

Once they release the Boston Report,the WAFL Presidents should launch their Motion of NO CONFIDENCE in the Bastards!

I don't think anyones patting anyone on any backs - nobody cares anymore,

Where does the motion of no confidence get them Grassy?

The same place as the united front to stop the alignment,? that worked well didn't it.

Whether you or I like it or not more change is on the way.

Agree Baz that changes are imminent and needed for our competition , however the WAFL G7 presidents shouldn't bend over completley to the whims of the WAFC and the AFL clubs...
WAFC should be more focussed on getting the New Stadium deal done and dusted ASAP , hopefully there is something in that deal for the WAFL clubs...If not we a up shit creek without a paddle

Time to celebrate with a 0.001126443% increase on last years opening round.

Or if we are to believe our Bogendean Brethren (BB) then it's more like a 5% increase given the standing room only crowd at the "Eastern derby"

Wasn't a united front? What are you going on about the presidents all opposed it didn't they and then the WAFC just did what it wanted and when the game was up a few clubs said well might as well make the most of it.

In the end the WAFL clubs have no choice but to accept them, the constitution of the WAFC is clear on that. A constitution the WAFL clubs all agreed to many years ago.

As Dwert says while we should not give in completely - Its about getting the best deal we can and for some WAL clubs the changes could be of great benefit and indeed for the future of the comp.

As far as the new gov goes, what if Mick Murray supports the changes, ever thought of that? Mate when 7000 people are turning up on the weekend out of a city of 2 Million , do the maths, its hardly a vote getter is it.

Senior Seagull wrote: Time to celebrate with a 0.001126443% increase on last years opening round.

Or if we are to believe our Bogendean Brethren (BB) then it's more like a 5% increase given the standing room only crowd at the "Eastern derby"

Well let's see who ends up with the bigger crowd after saturday night. The same visiting team so it should be a useful comparison.

Cesspit wrote:

Senior Seagull wrote: Time to celebrate with a 0.001126443% increase on last years opening round.

Or if we are to believe our Bogendean Brethren (BB) then it's more like a 5% increase given the standing room only crowd at the "Eastern derby"

Well let's see who ends up with the bigger crowd after saturday night. The same visiting team so it should be a useful comparison.

Keep in mind they will include a rounded up hybrid estimate Colts number in their final figure that Swans don't Cess...we only tally those who have paid or passed through the gate when it's manned.

Good point BH.

Judging by the bulging Can Bar last week there was 2000 easy.