TOPIC:

wow, what a surprise - Seagull and Freezin posting more rubbish.
footy season is back and so is the school kindy level of so-called banter..

Freezin wrote: Be careful what you post about the SDFC mate....these boys have friends in high places here on Oz Footy....any tears on their behalf and the big one comes down pretty hard on all perpetrators....thought initially it was unjust and unfair....now realize it's simply a case of protecting the weak.....hopefully for your sake Heater those black n white tear ducts aren't flowing.....tick tock tick tock....matter of time I guess

Looks like poor old Swan42 has cracked a sad and left us, bit like the masses of SDFC fans that have abandoned basso to its fate.

MarkOlsen wrote: wow, what a surprise - Seagull and Freezin posting more rubbish.
footy season is back and so is the school kindy level of so-called banter..

Ssshhhh Mark were not allowed to let the cat out of the bag....apparently!

Heater19 wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote:

Heater19 wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: We will all wait with bated breath for the enormous amount of SF supporters coming up to Basso this week then shall we Bazza...is the Stephen Michael Express coming out of retirement to ship them all up?

Krakouer is going to drive them all up, his car has a new set of wheels and tyres courtesy of the SDFC. But keep quiet about that, it was done off the books.

Mums the word Heater funnily enough I remember a fellow with a similar sounding name to yours posting the same thing on here over and over the last few years before he got permanently banned....uncanny!

Swan Districts under the table payments are public knowledge, so too is their reprimand when they got caught out cheating and were fined.
Kraks can drive as fast as he wants too, I've heard SDFC also pay players speeding fines outside of the salary cap.

Why would we need to pay speeding fines when we are all driving around in stolen cars with unregistered number plates

Swandog wrote:

chaddy22 wrote:

Swandog wrote:

Bazza wrote: EF v C 1651
SD v P 1737
SF v S 1941
EP v T 1781

Pretty poor all round up against nothing - even given the weather.

SF and Subi pulled the biggest crowd by a bit, twilight timing seemed to work.

I wouldnt believe those figures, was bigger than 1730 at Basso and no way Sat nights shocking game had more ppl, zero in the outer

Leederville has a couple of decent grandstands.Have to sit in the outer on most grounds.Will be interested in seeing what improvements are at Claremont.

Basso has a couple of big ones too that were chokkas..its fake news

I agree Swandog, there seemed to be more than 1700 people at the game. I know they ran out of budgets at the Bassendean entrance which I thought was pretty poor. Just another example of the WAFL seeming to be unprepared or not really caring about the public.

Cesspit wrote:

Swandog wrote:

chaddy22 wrote:

Swandog wrote:

Bazza wrote: EF v C 1651
SD v P 1737
SF v S 1941
EP v T 1781

Pretty poor all round up against nothing - even given the weather.

SF and Subi pulled the biggest crowd by a bit, twilight timing seemed to work.

I wouldnt believe those figures, was bigger than 1730 at Basso and no way Sat nights shocking game had more ppl, zero in the outer

Leederville has a couple of decent grandstands.Have to sit in the outer on most grounds.Will be interested in seeing what improvements are at Claremont.

Basso has a couple of big ones too that were chokkas..its fake news

I agree Swandog, there seemed to be more than 1700 people at the game. I know they ran out of budgets at the Bassendean entrance which I thought was pretty poor. Just another example of the WAFL seeming to be unprepared or not really caring about the public.

I did mention this to Hodes on the weekend Cesspit. hopefully he will take it up with the WAFL and we will have an extra cupla thousand budgets on hand for the masses we expect down at Basso this weekend arriving via the Stephen Michael Express. Point taken though, I was one that missed out on a budget arriving just before 3qtr time of the ressies. Annoying when you are trying to work out the new faces from the opposition, especially some of those talented young kids Perth had on display I'll be keeping an eye out for in future #25 in particular

Considering the McDonald Stand & Billy Walker Stand were pretty full not too mention the members & the Swan Bar 1737 does seem a little short of what those who actually attended the game would have estimated the crowd at. Funnily enough it was around the same official crowd figure for when we played SF at Basso last year but yet there seemed to be nearly the double the amount of fans there? Maybe Swans just don't add on the 500 extra for the Colts that other clubs do?

Beasley Hutton wrote: Considering the McDonald Stand & Billy Walker Stand were pretty full not too mention the members & the Swan Bar 1731 does seem a little short of what those who actually attended the game would have estimated the crowd at. Funnily enough it was around the same official crowd figure for when we played SF at Basso last year but yet there seemed to be nearly the double the amount of fans there? Maybe Swans just don't add on the 500 extra for the Colts that other clubs do?

That'd be the 500 who get down extra early before the colts and gate staff so they don't have to pay right BH??? We do have a few hundred that do this consistently to save a buck...tight economy we live in nowadays...personally I though 2000 max at the ground on Saturday so numbers seem about right to me

Beasley Hutton wrote: Considering the McDonald Stand & Billy Walker Stand were pretty full

White ants don't count in the attendance.

Dirty Weekender wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: Considering the McDonald Stand & Billy Walker Stand were pretty full not too mention the members & the Swan Bar 1737 does seem a little short of what those who actually attended the game would have estimated the crowd at. Funnily enough it was around the same official crowd figure for when we played SF at Basso last year but yet there seemed to be nearly the double the amount of fans there? Maybe Swans just don't add on the 500 extra for the Colts that other clubs do?

That'd be the 500 who get down extra early before the colts and gate staff so they don't have to pay right BH??? We do have a few hundred that do this consistently to save a buck...tight economy we live in nowadays...personally I though 2000 max at the ground on Saturday so numbers seem about right to me

Yeah mate and the likes of myself and 42 are just a couple of many of those who watch the Colts from the start where there is no one manning the gates. I would have estimated 2000 on Saturday watching the League as I outlined earlier (the stands, members & swan bar all pretty full) considering there would have been around 500 watching the Colts that means that only 1237 were apparently watching the League....I think not!
DW I'm surprised you didn't estimate the crowd as 4000 considering you were apparently seeing double by the end of the game!