TOPIC:

Another typical WAFL faarrkk up. 6PR said it best today. Reiwa about to walk. Surely both parties were advised before contracts were exchanged

This commission reminds me of the Rowan Atkinson Blackadder series mate

No offence to Blackadder

So anyone want to guess which club is actively contacting the competitors of the companies who are sponsoring the tv broadcast? Trying to get the competitors to sponsor them putting the tv deal in jeopardy.

Barney wrote: So anyone want to guess which club is actively contacting the competitors of the companies who are sponsoring the tv broadcast? Trying to get the competitors to sponsor them putting the tv deal in jeopardy.

I presume thats how one club got their major sponsor ahead of the TV deal.

Do tell some more Barney, this sounds interesting.

Although going by what the topics about both decisions would have been made by the WAFC wouldn't they? REIWA for the WAFL and Domain for the AFL.

hawkhawkins wrote:

Barney wrote: So anyone want to guess which club is actively contacting the competitors of the companies who are sponsoring the tv broadcast? Trying to get the competitors to sponsor them putting the tv deal in jeopardy.

I presume thats how one club got their major sponsor ahead of the TV deal.

Really???????
So WP spent an enormous amount of time in meetings, conferencing, phone calls, and on and on and eventually lined up a MAJOR sponsor n channel 9 proudly displaying this logo for the entire 2014 season on jumpers, ground and on and on (no issue with the WAFL, deadly silent about the entire matter) - did this over 1 year before channel 7 came on board as the WAFL's proffered televiser and now the suggestion is that WE at WP have made the error!!!
REALLY???????

Yep pretty well nailed it right on the head there growler.......pretty niaive of WP dont you think