TOPIC:

This is not about the player, I have only seen him play rarely and my opinion of his rating is neither here nor there.

Having said that I am not sure that Hampson, Lee, Schloithe, Nelson, Cary, et al would not consider him to have the same rating in value to the WAFL as the worst.

The old adage of any publicity is good publicity is just plain wrong when the facts are not reported.

I am not sure how many games he played last year in the league and reserves but I am sure I could if I wanted, just like the reporter, not journalist cos they are not one!

The other issue for me is that perhaps the 'incident' is part of that lathlain cultural issue, again don't know but it begs the question

Slow news day I think Grump. I was amazed when I saw it on page 3 as I think it is such a non story. Firstly most people would not know who Matt Rogers is. The next is that these sorts of legal manoeuvrings are quite common and why you would have to highlight one particular case on page 3 of the West is completely beyond me. I am not trivialising the incident or saying that the lady doesn't have the right to take it to court but I don't understand why it would be a public interest story??

mikeh wrote: Slow news day I think Grump. I was amazed when I saw it on page 3 as I think it is such a non story. Firstly most people would not know who Matt Rogers is. The next is that these sorts of legal manoeuvrings are quite common and why you would have to highlight one particular case on page 3 of the West is completely beyond me. I am not trivialising the incident or saying that the lady doesn't have the right to take it to court but I don't understand why it would be a public interest story??

Funnily enough the seven news just had it on

Get use to the tribe dished out by SWM.