TOPIC:

All I know on this is that Claremont didn't want to risk their Junior program and the $$$ of draft money that comes from it

Subi didn't want to risk it's lucrative deal at Patterson's over it

As for Perth - well we would have to ask their board to get truths

Don't give a flying rat fark about EP - I know the real truth nowadays .... and Mandurah Centrelinks ???? well they are the bastard lovechild and aren't worth pissing on let alone wondering about

Claremont were keen on the eagles the junior programme would of stayed in place - and they would of kept their AFLers, as for Subi, the patersons deal would of stayed in place, not sure what your thinking there.

Perth were frantic for it, was quite widely reported in the media and are still angling in with the shared deal at Lathlain.

It has nothing at all to do with what I was thinking at all Baz mate .... it was what those two clubs concerns were about merging with either of the AFL scumbags at that time

Bazza wrote: Claremont were keen on the eagles the junior programme would of stayed in place - and they would of kept their AFLers, as for Subi, the patersons deal would of stayed in place, not sure what your thinking there.

Perth were frantic for it, was quite widely reported in the media and are still angling in with the shared deal at Lathlain.

Crap.

Cesspit wrote:

Bazza wrote: Claremont were keen on the eagles the junior programme would of stayed in place - and they would of kept their AFLers, as for Subi, the patersons deal would of stayed in place, not sure what your thinking there.

Perth were frantic for it, was quite widely reported in the media and are still angling in with the shared deal at Lathlain.

Crap.

Spot on Cesspit until he puts up a source from the PFC it's all bullshit, fancy believing something that hack Hackdorn writes in the sports pages.

Peter North wrote:

Cesspit wrote:

Bazza wrote: Claremont were keen on the eagles the junior programme would of stayed in place - and they would of kept their AFLers, as for Subi, the patersons deal would of stayed in place, not sure what your thinking there.

Perth were frantic for it, was quite widely reported in the media and are still angling in with the shared deal at Lathlain.

Crap.

Spot on Cesspit until he puts up a source from the PFC it's all bullshit, fancy believing something that hack Hackdorn writes in the sports pages.[/quote]

You read the dh's articles Pete??? Heavens mate, you must be bored.

BC wrote: hagdorn is East Fremantle mate

58shark wrote:

BC wrote: hagdorn is East Fremantle mate

Hackdorn couldnt possibly be freeze ...or could he?!?!

58shark wrote:

Peter North wrote:

Cesspit wrote:

Bazza wrote: Claremont were keen on the eagles the junior programme would of stayed in place - and they would of kept their AFLers, as for Subi, the patersons deal would of stayed in place, not sure what your thinking there.

Perth were frantic for it, was quite widely reported in the media and are still angling in with the shared deal at Lathlain.

Crap.

Spot on Cesspit until he puts up a source from the PFC it's all bullshit, fancy believing something that hack Hackdorn writes in the sports pages.[/quote]

You read the dh's articles Pete??? Heavens mate, you must be bored.

No I don't read them 58 but obviously Bazza does and he seems to believe them.