TOPIC:

MikeXU1 wrote:

astro wrote: That clip is Gold, hope its goes viral

Viral on here anyway. I think SMATT posted in the SANFL threads a few weeks back.

Mike.

Yes that's correct. SAMATT did post about a month ago, from memory...

Was i the only one who read todays West. Seriously the WAFC are pissing into the wind.Peel-no fans no players no hope.

Dear wafc

You are all a bunch of A holes! I wouldn't let you change a tyre on my car never mind administrate a football competition! Your nothing but a bunch self perpetuating AFL love child's who are trying to destroy the wafl competition with every opportunity at the same time blaming the competition because they won't participate in your outright incompetence and tyranny!

Get stuffed and hope you all choke on your own vomit!

I think you mean the 'so called' football commission for want of a better word. Whom still have a lot of questions to answer for...

Lucifer wrote: Dear wafc

You are all a bunch of A holes! I wouldn't let you change a tyre on my car never mind administrate a football competition! Your nothing but a bunch self perpetuating AFL love child's who are trying to destroy the wafl competition with every opportunity at the same time blaming the competition because they won't participate in your outright incompetence and tyranny!

Get stuffed and hope you all choke on your own vomit!

They dont give a stuff about the WAFL clubs mate - its just dockers and eagles for them.

come to think of it the more i think about it the more i feel my own president and chairman of the wafl clubs heart isnt even in the right place, he is an avid dockers fan goes to every game and has been piss weak all through this, his main focus is afl as well, sffc just comes a distant 2nd.

anchorman wrote: Come on AKA you are not turning on your own are you.Thats like eating your own.Shame on you AKA.

A/man not that I need to defend Bazza and we are very rarely on the same side, one has to face facts when they are patently obvious.

How he could suggest that the 'G7' WAFL clubs supported the alignment is one of the most incredible comments I have ever read. The fact is that the alignment was presented to the 'G7' as a fait accompli. Under no circumstances, if there had been a vote for or against the alignment it would have been 2 for and 7 against.

What the G7 tried to so was to get the best financial arrangement possible. Never have the G7 clubs indicated that they were in agreement with the alignment. If the South Freo President cannot represent South Freo's best interest, then I would suggest that he is in an invidious and unsustainable position, and should reconsider his position under those circumstances.

anchorman wrote: But wouldn't the Souths Board have told Rait that they weren't happy with what he was doing?

Since you do not have a good knowledge of the WAFl, perhaps I should let you know that the only reason we have Peel is because the then President of Perth voted for Peel directly against the vote of the Perth board.

My point remains valid, that if the current South Freo President cannot represent the best interest of South Freo, he should resign.

I notice the so called football commission mention the word integrity. Do they even know what that word means, it has to be asked? Or have they confused it with the word integrate? Both words have different meanings which they probably do not understand! I hope they don't lecture the 7 Wafl clubs about integrity when the excuse for a football commission is one of the main culprits in this whole bloody mess!

I was also confused when Raitt said all wafl clubs supported the alignment because what i and all other Claremont members were told in our newsletter was that the clubs (apart from ep and peel obviously) had no input or decision in the matter at all.
Raponi would be a good replacement..

Yeah, he has sent out a lot of confusing stuff that is not supported by most wafl people.