TOPIC:

i noticed in the paper that their will be a trial game for the under 19's championship to be held on saturday at leederville oval.of the 46 who are attending more then half are from three clubs.9 from claremont and 8 each from east perth and east fremantle..

Thanks Chaddy, 19s played after the 17s game v EF side of players between 16-19 years old. WA had 4 East Perth; 3 from Claremont, peel, Subi, swans and Falcons and 2 each from EFFC and SFFC. Perth none and only 2 (if you include their ex Claremont kid) in the 19s.
... Pile in Stand the Test

wrote:

Thanks Chaddy, 19s played after the 17s game v EF side of players between 16-19 years old. WA had 4 East Perth; 3 from Claremont, peel, Subi, swans and Falcons and 2 each from EFFC and SFFC. Perth none and only 2 (if you include their ex Claremont kid) in the 19s.
... Pile in Stand the Test

Without presuming to speak for STT I would think the appropriate response would be QED.

wrote:

Thanks Chaddy, 19s played after the 17s game v EF side of players between 16-19 years old. WA had 4 East Perth; 3 from Claremont, peel, Subi, swans and Falcons and 2 each from EFFC and SFFC. Perth none and only 2 (if you include their ex Claremont kid) in the 19s.
... Pile in Stand the Test

been awhile since we've seen a good crop of youngsters coming from east perth.we have underperformed in players in the state side and drafting.hopefully this is a start of better things to come.one of the reasons i heard why east perth pulled out of the alignment was the fear that they might lose some of their junior zone.something peel may have to think about if they continue with the alignment.i must say i have had a bit of amusement from the banter about a certain club's zone.

wrote:

wrote:

Thanks Chaddy, 19s played after the 17s game v EF side of players between 16-19 years old. WA had 4 East Perth; 3 from Claremont, peel, Subi, swans and Falcons and 2 each from EFFC and SFFC. Perth none and only 2 (if you include their ex Claremont kid) in the 19s.
... Pile in Stand the Test

been awhile since we've seen a good crop of youngsters coming from east perth.we have underperformed in players in the state side and drafting.hopefully this is a start of better things to come.one of the reasons i heard why east perth pulled out of the alignment was the fear that they might lose some of their junior zone.something peel may have to think about if they continue with the alignment.i must say i have had a bit of amusement from the banter about a certain club's zone.

Should be a use it or you lose it policy. If Peel can't give player's in their zone a clear crack at it then they should lose some of their zone, give it to SF and EF can relinquish a few junior zones to Perth and take a few from SF to compensate.

East Perth reserves and colts have been doing very well the last few years and probably got more tall timber than any other club. You've got that many you can afford to give a few away to Perth. Barns, East, Amos and La Fontaine.

Most of those players couldn’t get a reserves game at EP DD so they are just list cloggers at Perth. Obviously the Ruck position at Perth is an issue you need to fix to for a crack at a flag.     Quite often being a state player at 16 or 18 doesn’t translate to being a quality senior footballer.