TOPIC:

anchorman wrote: I saw three that he saw as his main things he did.
But as I said swan don't accuse a man with out evidence.
Your two Swannie off siders have.They accuse yet give no evidence.
I wonder if that sound I hear is BH trying to think of some S/A answer to all this.
I appreciate your love of the WAFL Swan but have doubts about your off siders.As I have said before at least with you there can be a decent disagreement or discussion.

Please enlighten me as what those three are as I didn't see three in the article I read. Note the criterion is what has he achieved for the WAFL competition specifically.

Your wasting your time arguing with that old fool anchor 42 nothing you can say can sway his thinking even tho he has absolutely no idea about the WAFL!

Beasley Hutton wrote: Your wasting your time arguing with that old fool anchor 42 nothing you can say can sway his thinking even tho he has absolutely no idea about the WAFL!

BH I like to give people the benefit of the doubt. I am sure that A/man will ocme back and specify the three major achievements of Dorrington with respect to the WAFL competition. I await with interest his answer because I can't think of one let alone three achievements.

No A/man I don't know what is three achievements are with respect to the WAFL competition and I have read the article. That is the specific reason why I have asked you to list them on this thread. You asked us to name what we think were some of Dorrington's failures with respect to the WAFL and I name around ten. Now it is up to you to clearly and explicitly name what were Dorrington's three best achievements with respect to the WAFL competition as outlined in the article.

Once again over to you A/man and I await with much interest to read what those three achievements are.

why have you chosen to defend him out of interest ?

It is entirely up to you whether you outline the achievements of Dorrington or not. However, in not outlining those achievements here you significantly weaken your argument. As for Dorrington not coming on to defend his performance on this forum I have no way of knowing whether he checks out this site and this specific topic or not. What I will say that with respect to the host club scenario he equally did not canvas the views and opinions of the WAFL clubs' supporters and mebers. This is patently clear because of he had there would not be a host club arrangement.

As to articulating the faults of Dorrington I have done that. Do you specifically agree with or disagree with my list? How would you personally rate Dorrington's performance with respect to the WAFL competition?

a lot of posts on the topic for someone who doesnt care

i thought you didnt care

another post on a topic you say you dont care about

Swan42 provided you with some thoughts and opinions and asked you to respond.