TOPIC:

TheRock wrote:

King wrote: You've got my vote ##### is a disgrace to football and the new gm is just his puppet HAS NOT changed a thing my 80 year old grandmother could do a better job. What a power trip this guy is on and destroying if not destroyed over a 100 year old club lets see how the court case goes and I predict kelmscott will be lucky to have a football club next year . What a shame but i hope the league stands up to him and wins.

Sorry for being naïve, but what court case?

Presuming this was the potential court case

www.pressreader.com/australia/the-west-a...0606/282265255397540

OzFooty Admin wrote: A warning here. Be careful of the language, tone and allegations when you name someone on this forum. I have received complaints before on this thread. I suggest you read the terms and conditions of this forum.

Has Donald Trump tweeted his dissatisfaction with the content of this thread?

Not sure Cardinal Pell's an avid reader of Ozfooty, fair to say even if he was he's probably had bigger issues occupying his time this last week.

If it's Mrs McCraken, well she's had it in for Phil since Phil had a short term relationship with Sleevesy's Mum during the 3/4 time break at the 'Shank'a few years back.

I wonder if the two parties came to an agreement where they both win ?? Interesting

cowboy wrote: So if you're not a puppet that'd mean you approved the dodgey players? Good job chooka just another one in the line of a disgrace that is Kelmscott football club!

I am a paid employee in charge of getting bar trade and the social scene back up and running along with some admin work. I am the point of contact for the club and do not have any say in game day football matters so if you wish to keep running my name through the shit at least get your facts correct first.

Without a doubt Kelmy have done wrong by the waafl by laws and obviously some of there on field antics do not help them. But i think the abuse of its clubs/volunteers or hierachy has become over excessive. If anything the waafl needs to take this issue and have a hard look at them selves. We all know wembley got away with dodgy team sheets last year but they stil managed to move up a grade so noones perfect. Id say you ask any ammo footballer most of them would know or heard of players being paid to play in the ammo comp
and id say most clubs have done a dodgy on a team sheet before. Whether you dislike the Kelmscott football club of not, dont think anyone should pull the piss out of people who try to make the club function properly

In what way did Wembley get away with listing a player incorrectly on their B Reserves team list last year? They had their score wiped for the 2 games and would of been fined as per the WAAFL by-laws. Clubs are promoted or relegated on their League sides performance and as such Wembley earnt their spot in A Grade this year.

3 other clubs that I'm aware of also had matches taken off of them and were fined for playing ineligible players. Two of these were in finals so I reckon the WAAFL is looking pretty closely at all clubs on this issue.

All clubs are run by volunteers but very few (none) seem to continually have the same issues year in and year out that Kelmscott do. Quiet rightly everyone outside the club questions Kelmscott when they say each year they are changing the culture and no noticible improvement is seen or the behaviours get worse.

If those running Kelmscott don't want to get criticised, it's pretty simple...stop breaking the WAAFL by-laws and onfield play by the spirit of the game.