TOPIC:

Devonleigh wrote: Leather, funny world, driving through nin bin in a couple of weeks. See if I can find the grave of cairns or morrosi.

Check also for Al Grasby.. It should be multi coloured.

Interesting reading there Devonleigh

Devonleigh wrote: Leather, funny world, driving through nin bin in a couple of weeks. See if I can find the grave of cairns or morrosi.

42, from memory you’ve banged on about conscription and Vietnam b4. Wish you would get your facts right on both. Try McMahon government, 72 and 71.
Please, blues poles wasn’t a good look when unemployment and inflation were thu the roof.

58, the following offer differing points???

arpq.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/old_age_pension.pdf
the point on keating is interesting!

www.aspc.unsw.edu.au/node/36/paper/2140

morningmail.org/who-stole-the-pension-fund/

cuffelinks.com.au/age-pension-not-welfare/

Are we paying 7.5% too much in income tax?

Devonleigh perhaps you might like to check this from the National Archive of Australia: www.naa.gov.au/collection/fact-sheets/fs164.aspx

This is a hard question. John Howard was very poor in his last 3 years.The most trustworthy to me was Bob Hawk..I also liked Paul Keating.But for longevity, standard of living and economic prosperity. I would say Bob Menzies.But have heard bad things about pig iron Bob like Anchorman is saying.

swan42 wrote:

Devonleigh wrote: Leather, funny world, driving through nin bin in a couple of weeks. See if I can find the grave of cairns or morrosi.

42, from memory you’ve banged on about conscription and Vietnam b4. Wish you would get your facts right on both. Try McMahon government, 72 and 71.
Please, blues poles wasn’t a good look when unemployment and inflation were thu the roof.

58, the following offer differing points???

arpq.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/old_age_pension.pdf
the point on keating is interesting!

www.aspc.unsw.edu.au/node/36/paper/2140

morningmail.org/who-stole-the-pension-fund/

cuffelinks.com.au/age-pension-not-welfare/

Are we paying 7.5% too much in income tax?

Devonleigh perhaps you might like to check this from the National Archive of Australia: www.naa.gov.au/collection/fact-sheets/fs164.aspx

Sure you got the right article?

Doesn't mention anything about blue poles.

Devonleigh wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Devonleigh wrote: Leather, funny world, driving through nin bin in a couple of weeks. See if I can find the grave of cairns or morrosi.

42, from memory you’ve banged on about conscription and Vietnam b4. Wish you would get your facts right on both. Try McMahon government, 72 and 71.
Please, blues poles wasn’t a good look when unemployment and inflation were thu the roof.

58, the following offer differing points???

arpq.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/old_age_pension.pdf
the point on keating is interesting!

www.aspc.unsw.edu.au/node/36/paper/2140

morningmail.org/who-stole-the-pension-fund/

cuffelinks.com.au/age-pension-not-welfare/

Are we paying 7.5% too much in income tax?

Devonleigh perhaps you might like to check this from the National Archive of Australia: www.naa.gov.au/collection/fact-sheets/fs164.aspx

Sure you got the right article?

Doesn't mention anything about blue poles.

And I quote:

42, from memory you’ve banged on about conscription and Vietnam b4. Wish you would get your facts right on both. Try McMahon government, 72 and 71.

Childish response, as I’ve gone well past McMahon, old cock.

Thought you were going to explain to those, who were unemployed at that time and when the nation was broke, how spending 1.3 mill on a drunkards painting was good fiscal policy?

Spending 1.3 mill on a painting would suggest the nation was not that broke.

Whoever was behind the purchase should be commended for their sharp sense of judgement. That drunkards painting would go for a fair penny no doubt. But i do not think it would ever be put up for sale.

Ti Em wrote: Spending 1.3 mill on a painting would suggest the nation was not that broke.

Whoever was behind the purchase should be commended for their sharp sense of judgement. That drunkards painting would go for a fair penny no doubt. But i do not think it would ever be put up for sale.

Who knows? Our governments are allowing the Chinese and Japs to buy the country, why not let them buy our artwork?

Yeah why not - could be fun. It would go for plenty that is for sure. Then re invest the funds back into fresh acquisitions and see if they appreciate as spectacularly as the drunkards work did.