TOPIC:

Grassy wrote: So let's say in a field of 7 Candidates,...

ALP 5

Lib 7

PHONP 6

Not that I would presume to tell you (I will only ask) but I personally think that One Nation should be placed last AND ALWAYS LAST.

did any of you deep down really think that Garrett could make a difference...politics is a business first and foremost with very little room left within it for idealists...any wonder we are disillusioned with the bloody lot of them regardless of which side of the room you align with. Irony is at least with his music Garrett can get his voice heard devoid of party censorship...much rather listen to the Oils than that childish babble parading itself as politics inside Parliament House

I couldnt give a stuff about politics but I am happy to see the Oils are back...saw their last show at Metro City 15 years back and look forward to the PA gig later in the year.

Dirty Weekender wrote: did any of you deep down really think that Garrett could make a difference...politics is a business first and foremost with very little room left within it for idealists...any wonder we are disillusioned with the bloody lot of them regardless of which side of the room you align with. Irony is at least with his music Garrett can get his voice heard devoid of party censorship...much rather listen to the Oils than that childish babble parading itself as politics inside Parliament House

DW what about the latest from Emperor Barnett's impersonation of Sgt Schultz "I know nothing" when he was asked about the One Nation policy and platform?

Grassy wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Grassy wrote: So let's say in a field of 7 Candidates,...

ALP 5

Lib 7

PHONP 6

Not that I would presume to tell you (I will only ask) but I personally think that One Nation should be placed last AND ALWAYS LAST.

Depends on the Candidate and whether that Candidate is pissed off with Pauline and birth Col's.

As for the 6 preference to PHONP,how would their preference help number 7 on the Ballot paper?

Just as a matter of principle.

How many electricians did that slimy dog called garrat kill again?

Hope he dies in a druggies grave, soon.

Devonleigh wrote: How many electricians did that slimy dog called garrat kill again?

Hope he dies in a druggies grave, soon.

Totally inappropriate and I think you should remove it.

This thread is about Garret, he was the minister responsible, the buck stopped with him, even being a labor minister he still has to take responsibility, so totally appropriate, even if the wording was a little "direct", the message is still relevant.

Senior Seagull wrote: This thread is about Garret, he was the minister responsible, the buck stopped with him, even being a labor minister he still has to take responsibility, so totally appropriate, even if the wording was a little "direct", the message is still relevant.

SS Devonleigh made a claim that is PATENTLY and DEMONSTRABLY UNTRUE.

swan42 wrote:

Devonleigh wrote: How many electricians did that slimy dog called garrat kill again?

Hope he dies in a druggies grave, soon.

Totally inappropriate and I think you should remove it.

Go stuff yourself old cock.

The slimball admitted responsibility then tried to blame others like the coward he is. To busy hugging whales in New Zealand to learn that 3 sparky's had died in this typical left wing harebrained scheme.

ITS HIS SIGNATURE ON THE PAPERWORK.

Four families have lost a loved one and you try and defend the dog.

Hope you never lose a child because of someones callous egotism.

www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affair...bd63ecd5fd5537bc93e4