TOPIC:

kirbs wrote:

30plusyeardrought wrote: I thought it was a great game of footy to watch..36 goals kicked free flowing,good to watch,the game was a good standard.
Much better than that boring as crap defensive games we have to watch where 12 goals wins the game.

The fact the opposition coaches showed no respect to the midfield...who's fault is that.

Any win in South Oz is a fantastic win.

Might be good to watch 30, but most teams in AFL will not allow you to play untouch footy, hence why Eagles or Adelaide not in the eight

I know the Eagles wont make the 8,Adelaide will be relying on results going there way to make it,that doesnt change that i found it an enjoyable game to watch regardless of who lets you play that way.

That's what happens when both teams play fast free flowing football Anchorman.

anchorman wrote:

kirbs wrote:

30plusyeardrought wrote: I thought it was a great game of footy to watch..36 goals kicked free flowing,good to watch,the game was a good standard.
Much better than that boring as crap defensive games we have to watch where 12 goals wins the game.

The fact the opposition coaches showed no respect to the midfield...who's fault is that.

Any win in South Oz is a fantastic win.

Might be good to watch 30, but most teams in AFL will not allow you to play untouch footy, hence why Eagles or Adelaide not in the eight

I bet both coaches were seething at the lack of hard ball contests. Kicking 36 goals show a lack of defence from both sides.
I am betting that Gaff, Masten and Shuey don't get that many easy possessions this week against the Pies.
Any win is a good win, but winning by playing uncontested football is not good.

Is that gaff, masten & shueys fault they didn't get physically tested?

terror wrote:

anchorman wrote:

kirbs wrote:

30plusyeardrought wrote: I thought it was a great game of footy to watch..36 goals kicked free flowing,good to watch,the game was a good standard.
Much better than that boring as crap defensive games we have to watch where 12 goals wins the game.

The fact the opposition coaches showed no respect to the midfield...who's fault is that.

Any win in South Oz is a fantastic win.

Might be good to watch 30, but most teams in AFL will not allow you to play untouch footy, hence why Eagles or Adelaide not in the eight

I bet both coaches were seething at the lack of hard ball contests. Kicking 36 goals show a lack of defence from both sides.
I am betting that Gaff, Masten and Shuey don't get that many easy possessions this week against the Pies.
Any win is a good win, but winning by playing uncontested football is not good.

Is that gaff, masten & shueys fault they didn't get physically tested?

Not at all, what it does say that Adelaide are soft, and many of there players run around looking for easy kicks

Were they soft when they beat the pies the week before?

terror wrote: Were they soft when they beat the pies the week before?

One week is a longtime in Football Terror, so after earning those 4 points against Pies, they gave them up to the Eagles by letting them play unaccountable football. Didn't see any other team out there letting Eagles do circle work last Saturday

anchorman wrote:

kirbs wrote:

30plusyeardrought wrote: I thought it was a great game of footy to watch..36 goals kicked free flowing,good to watch,the game was a good standard.
Much better than that boring as crap defensive games we have to watch where 12 goals wins the game.

The fact the opposition coaches showed no respect to the midfield...who's fault is that.

Any win in South Oz is a fantastic win.

Might be good to watch 30, but most teams in AFL will not allow you to play untouch footy, hence why Eagles or Adelaide not in the eight

I bet both coaches were seething at the lack of hard ball contests. Kicking 36 goals show a lack of defence from both sides.
I am betting that Gaff, Masten and Shuey don't get that many easy possessions this week against the Pies.
Any win is a good win, but winning by playing uncontested football is not good.

Gaff is and always has been an outside player. That is what he was drafted for so dont expect him to get many contested possessions a game.
11 of Mastens 23 disposals were contested, and Shuey had 10 contested.

Wtf are you on about A/M? Maybe get your facts straight?

Mate, I am just stating facts. At the end of the day I couldnt care less if WCE chose to play bruise free footy or not, as long as they win games (which is a rarity these days!). But the fact of the matter is out of the 3 you chose to pick on, which are the same 3 you always pick on, 2 of them you are incorrect about and 1 of them is employed to play that style of footy.

But in this instance you are wrong about Shuey and Masten. That is what I am getting at. Are you following me A/M?
And I am not saying they will get far playing bruise free footy.

Obviously you need to get the lenses in your rose glasses changed then as what you saw is incorrect. And that is a FACT