Notice: Undefined variable: ub in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 53

Notice: Undefined variable: ub in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 65

Deprecated: strripos(): Non-string needles will be interpreted as strings in the future. Use an explicit chr() call to preserve the current behavior in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 65

HM HEAVY MUG by ROX LeaderBoard 5

Welcome, Member
Username: Password: Remember me
Forgot your password? Forgot your username? Create an account
News & General
The Bar
DRI...I'm confused
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC:

DRI...I'm confused 10 years 7 months ago #28999

  • 58shark
  • Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 5178
  • Thank you received: 553
Can someone, anyone explain the following to me?
Michael Clarke is out because the DRI shows that the ball would have JUST clipped his bails. Yet in so many other decisions it is not out because not enough of the ball hit the wicket. FFS, I am confused. :pinch:
2x25= Seinor and Michael = 1xBrian Peake

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

DRI...I'm confused 10 years 7 months ago #29096

  • MikeXU1
  • MikeXU1's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Swan Districts FC
  • Posts: 682
  • Thank you received: 0
I'm confused too.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

DRI...I'm confused 10 years 7 months ago #29143

  • premiership hangover
  • premiership hangover's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 1155
  • Thank you received: 131
Pretty simple guys, its all about sticking with the umpires original decision, if he was given not out and it was reviewed it would have been given not out at review
Save a tree and eat a beaver

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

DRI...I'm confused 10 years 7 months ago #29148

  • BC
  • BC's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 8990
  • Thank you received: 1553
correct ph...due to the margin of error factored into DRS if the umpy gives it out or not out and its shown to be clipping the stumps the original decision is confirmed. for the umpys decision to be overturned it either needs to be hitting the stumps by at least half the ball or missing completely.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by BC.

DRI...I'm confused 10 years 7 months ago #29193

  • 58shark
  • Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 5178
  • Thank you received: 553
Ok, thanks for the explanation. We can live with that, so long as it is consistent.
2x25= Seinor and Michael = 1xBrian Peake

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

DRI...I'm confused 10 years 7 months ago #29590

  • Soprano
  • Soprano's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 290
  • Thank you received: 0
I am pretty sure this exact scenario has been discussed already. It has been consistent.

What annoys me is that they give a tolerance for the error factor of the DRS. Isnt that what it is supposed to do? Eliminate human error? Obviously it is not 100% and doesnt do that, Well done to the Indians for not adopting it!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
  • Page:
  • 1
News & General
The Bar
DRI...I'm confused

Search

Keyword

Who's Online?

We have 383 guests and one member online

  • Bazza

Newest Footy Recruits

  • Lost WAFL
  • Duncs1977
  • MrBulldog2020
  • MrBulldog
  • FremantlesFinest