TOPIC:

Well if they flew Giro to Brisbane to be a pointless spectator with Angus Schumacher we'd be sitting on top of the ladder,instead of stewing over a 1 point loss against a near full strength Subiaco,so your way off unfortunately. 

They seemed to have every answer regardless what we threw at them. Should be a good game against Claremont, if we win the game the players might dare to think of the F word. 

ROYAL 2019 wrote:

They seemed to have every answer regardless what we threw at them. Should be a good game against Claremont, if we win the game the players might dare to think of the F word. W

Why on earth Royal did the W.Coast tossers take Schumacher a top up player,who has been our form midfielder,over there just to be an emergency,when they drop Dixon whose a player on their actual list,gets omitted which is an absolute joke.

Didn’t help losing him Lucky, his left foot can break the game open.  I think we have been relatively untouched by covid and injury thus  far.  So I'm factoring in that we might have some compromised teams at some point. 

ROYAL 2019 wrote:

Didn’t help losing him Lucky, his left foot can break the game open.  I think we have been relatively untouched by covid and injury thus  far.  So I'm factoring in that we might have some compromised teams at some point. 

I think most of the squad has already contracted it in the pre season.

ROYAL 2019 wrote:

I think we maybe a hair in front of Perth but not drastically Lucky. One game in isolation is irrelevant.  If we had started 4/0 or 3/1 with our easy draw I would be a little more ebullient. Not a fan of these short seasons you lose a few in a row and your in trouble. If we beat Claremont away we are back in the hunt. You thought we would win every game so far so your 50 percent. I thought we would win the first two narrowly and lose the next two so that’s 100 percent. 

We are on the same page  R2019.If we are aspiring to be a top 5 side.this year. We have to beat nearly every team that finished above us last year.We failed against the sharks who seem to have improved and a subi side with still some premiership players missing.The fact that we couldn't  shows we need to improve a a lot..We turned over the ball too often on saturday and good sides  seem to find ways to win close matches.I think we have improved from last year but i think we need to improve a lot to be a serious top 5 threat..The area  which concerns me most is our key talls who are our achilles heel and none leave me with any confidence.It was something that was not addressed in our recruiting and we don't have too many alternatives.

chaddy22 wrote:

ROYAL 2019 wrote:

I think we maybe a hair in front of Perth but not drastically Lucky. One game in isolation is irrelevant.  If we had started 4/0 or 3/1 with our easy draw I would be a little more ebullient. Not a fan of these short seasons you lose a few in a row and your in trouble. If we beat Claremont away we are back in the hunt. You thought we would win every game so far so your 50 percent. I thought we would win the first two narrowly and lose the next two so that’s 100 percent. 

We are on the same page  R2019.If we are aspiring to be a top 5 side.this year. We have to beat nearly every team that finished above us last year.We failed against the sharks who seem to have improved and a subi side with still some premiership players missing.The fact that we couldn't  shows we need to improve a a lot..We turned over the ball too often on saturday and good sides  seem to find ways to win close matches.I think we have improved from last year but i think we need to improve a lot to be a serious top 5 threat..The area  which concerns me most is our key talls who are our achilles heel and none leave me with any confidence.It was something that was not addressed in our recruiting and we don't have too many alternatives.

This time last year we were 0/4 with a percentage of 60,and now we are currently sitting 4th at 2/4 with a percentage of 120,defeated top5 side Swans,who just knocked off the Tigers,went within 1 point of defeating reigning premiers SUBI who were virtually full strength,so if was Royal2019 i would take it as an insult he shared any views with you,as you are clearly quite clueless.

royallucky wrote:

ROYAL 2019 wrote:

They seemed to have every answer regardless what we threw at them. Should be a good game against Claremont, if we win the game the players might dare to think of the F word. W

Why on earth Royal did the W.Coast tossers take Schumacher a top up player,who has been our form midfielder,over there just to be an emergency,when they drop Dixon whose a player on their actual list,gets omitted which is an absolute joke.

Wc had too many talls apparently 

royallucky wrote:

chaddy22 wrote:

ROYAL 2019 wrote:

I think we maybe a hair in front of Perth but not drastically Lucky. One game in isolation is irrelevant.  If we had started 4/0 or 3/1 with our easy draw I would be a little more ebullient. Not a fan of these short seasons you lose a few in a row and your in trouble. If we beat Claremont away we are back in the hunt. You thought we would win every game so far so your 50 percent. I thought we would win the first two narrowly and lose the next two so that’s 100 percent. 

We are on the same page  R2019.If we are aspiring to be a top 5 side.this year. We have to beat nearly every team that finished above us last year.We failed against the sharks who seem to have improved and a subi side with still some premiership players missing.The fact that we couldn't  shows we need to improve a a lot..We turned over the ball too often on saturday and good sides  seem to find ways to win close matches.I think we have improved from last year but i think we need to improve a lot to be a serious top 5 threat..The area  which concerns me most is our key talls who are our achilles heel and none leave me with any confidence.It was something that was not addressed in our recruiting and we don't have too many alternatives.

This time last year we were 0/4 with a percentage of 60,and now we are currently sitting 4th at 2/4 with a percentage of 120,defeated top5 side Swans,who just knocked off the Tigers,went within 1 point of defeating reigning premiers SUBI who were virtually full strength,so if was Royal2019 i would take it as an insult he shared any views with you,as you are clearly quite clueless.

We could not beat he reigning premiers with 7 missing premiership players. from last year.You see it as a achievement and i see it as a lost opportunity.

DG wrote:

royallucky wrote:

ROYAL 2019 wrote:

They seemed to have every answer regardless what we threw at them. Should be a good game against Claremont, if we win the game the players might dare to think of the F word. W

Why on earth Royal did the W.Coast tossers take Schumacher a top up player,who has been our form midfielder,over there just to be an emergency,when they drop Dixon whose a player on their actual list,gets omitted which is an absolute joke.

Wc had too many talls apparently 

Well they must have had too many mids as well , which begs the question why he was sent over there in the first place, and i would have accepted the farcical decision if he had actually played