TOPIC:

Can't believe Jarrod is worried about his players losing interest and going bush...fark me his reserves have just won a GF....he has depth galore....well much more than the rest of us......plus his club have a war chest as usual to replenish as needed....how many foreigners did you pick again Jarrod?

Noticed on the radio interview from last Thursday or Friday, Jarrod was not critical of the alignment either.

westaussieguy wrote: Noticed on the radio interview from last Thursday or Friday, Jarrod was not critical of the alignment either.

I bet he is. Coaches and players won't talk against it on air.

Make no mistake had Subi won yesterday and last year he wouldn't be whinging about it. He's only whinging because they denied Subiaco another two premierships. He would be be more than happy for Peel to finish second as long as Subiaco win the flag.

MarkOlsen wrote: Apparently he spoke about how it isn't fair that Subi can pay all this money for players to be the best team in the wafl and still can't win the grand final.
Absolute injustice

Bingo !!!

BC wrote: It's pretty clear in today's West what he said and I for one back him to the hilt. It's disappointing when you play Peel during the year and they're at a certain level than they drop in 6 full time pro's who've played the back half of the season in the AFL and knock off a team which finished 7 games ahead of them....that's just not right.

It hurts doesn't BC, now you have a fair idea how the rest of us feel. Again absolutely no sympathy and a good result for mine.

BC wrote: so tell me MO...or is it Larry or Curly? what is Subi's unfair advantage exactly and how does it impact on the competition? spell it out for us all....if it's a financial one due to the seats deal then we operate under the same salary cap as the other non-aligned teams. if you think Subi is paying outside the cap present some proof as I'm sure the WAFC and other clubs would be interested. from memory only SD and WP have been caught breaching the salary cap in recent times so I wouldn't think you'd be pointing the finger around that...so what is this huge advantage we have and how does it provide a pathway to sustained success?

F*&k me, give me strength. Maybe you $ubi lot genuinely don't know any different, brain washed maybe. Are you lot sure you weren't a part of Jones Town back in the 70,s.

DD wrote: Schofield what a hypocrite lol. Only a week or so ago when asked about the Peel/Freo alignment he said he didn't have a problem with it, it just means his club has to work harder to get better. Now the bitter pill of defeat has him whinging crapping on about how UNFAIR IT IS.

Well WANKER, how fucking unfair is it you bastards have had an UNFAIR ADVANTAGE over the rest of the WAFL comp the last 15 or 20 years?

Come and coach Perth and see how much you love these blokes. You would snapping up the next AFL assistant offer. But it's like "Nah, nah" because you would be on good coin at $ubi, very good coin.

www.perthnow.com.au/sport/subiaco-coach-...a9f9cee17cb71ec3da7f

spot on!

DG wrote: Would it be fair to say even in the wafl's heyday the clubs with the biggest cheque books got the best players?

Spot on Dags but the money generated was based on the best marketing clubs or those that worked the zones better, not being given a gold mine seating arrangement from a venue that was payed by the tax payer.

Apparently all these Victorians and blokes like Litherland and Lockyer just lob at Subi by chance according to Schofield and haven't pushed any local kids out of a grand final spot.