TOPIC:

ArkRoyal wrote: mike., were they like this back in the late 70s? You would not think that we lent them any money, either.

Having said all that, Capes and others should not have made the remarks they did.

Did you return the favour Ark when we saved your ass in the late 70’s/early80’s? Very generous of you.

Write Subi off at your peril. True, they don't seem to be the all-conquering force of recent years. But their losses have been against C and SF. Of their remaining 5 games, they are likely to win at 4, which will be enough to get them into finals. If they have a full list come finals time, they are still a read threat.

mikeh wrote:

58shark wrote: Bugger me, I thought I’d try another site to get away from turkeys from mrp, but they’re everywhere. Shoot, they really do have a boring life!!!!

Just imagine how insufferable they would be if they actually won a flag....

or even just make finals mate...

DD: steady on; and creditors whom took only 10 per cent. The largest creditor was the council, from memory.

TN:true; what I would say about it, is that in both games, whether we had a fullish side or had an injurred side playing, we got to the lead in the second term and then lost the games. In truth, that is bad football and bad culture, unassociated with good sides.

As, I said above, assuming the Demons hold form -- which is supposition given what happened last year -- but if everything is equal -- we need the PFC to beat WP this week.