TOPIC:

swan42 wrote:

Before the Bounce wrote:

anchorman wrote: FFS Multi, how come for some one that hates the AFL and Dockers you give the impression that you know a lot about what is going on!!!!!!!
Given up on your beloved Sydney to become a Dockers sniper!!!!!!

You would know a lot about dirty snipers Anchor as your club has had a few of them over the years. Kickett. Hedland the Carr bros Crowley and now Suban. Is there any I missed.
Interesting that Wingard still goes by the players code after the hit he took from Hodge.

BTB Seriously? So Suban should have got 4-6 weeks for viciously attacking the Eagles' player's teeth? Suban is the innocent victim here and no amount of deflection and obfuscation will remove the blight on a player who CHOSE to bite another player.

Do not 100% agree, Masten should not have done, but Suban should not have gone at Masten after the ball left the area, and if an Umpire had paid a free for Suban going high on Masten (arm in the face) then maybe the incident does not happen at all.

Mate you must have been watching a different one to the ump As well he reported him on the spot and he was a hell of a lot closer than you or me

Bazza wrote: Mate you must have been watching a different one to the ump As well he reported him on the spot and he was a hell of a lot closer than you or me

And the replay will show what I just said. Umpire has one quick look at it and has to make a judgement then & there, and because they get scrutinised they usually err on the side of caution and report.

By the way MRP see what you and I see as many times they like, as fast as they want or a slow as they want, so regardless of an Umpire making a spur of the moment decision in real time they are the Judge/Jury, the Umpire is only a policeman.

kirbs wrote:

Bazza wrote: Mate you must have been watching a different one to the ump As well he reported him on the spot and he was a hell of a lot closer than you or me

And the replay will show what I just said. Umpire has one quick look at it and has to make a judgement then & there, and because they get scrutinised they usually err on the side of caution and report.

By the way MRP see what you and I see as many times they like, as fast as they want or a slow as they want, so regardless of an Umpire making a spur of the moment decision in real time they are the Judge/Jury, the Umpire is only a policeman.

Well the policeman did his job, rather than just pay a free kick.

they will have in the back of their minds the where we are at season wise finals and his BM hopes, although they should not, its just human nature and may help him out.

Fyfe case thrown out - common sense prevailed.

JB wrote: Fyfe case thrown out - common sense prevailed.

Contact football does have a heartbeat....for now!!

More a murmur than a heart beat.

kirbs wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Before the Bounce wrote:

anchorman wrote: FFS Multi, how come for some one that hates the AFL and Dockers you give the impression that you know a lot about what is going on!!!!!!!
Given up on your beloved Sydney to become a Dockers sniper!!!!!!

You would know a lot about dirty snipers Anchor as your club has had a few of them over the years. Kickett. Hedland the Carr bros Crowley and now Suban. Is there any I missed.
Interesting that Wingard still goes by the players code after the hit he took from Hodge.

BTB Seriously? So Suban should have got 4-6 weeks for viciously attacking the Eagles' player's teeth? Suban is the innocent victim here and no amount of deflection and obfuscation will remove the blight on a player who CHOSE to bite another player.

Do not 100% agree, Masten should not have done, but Suban should not have gone at Masten after the ball left the area, and if an Umpire had paid a free for Suban going high on Masten (arm in the face) then maybe the incident does not happen at all.

Could not of said it any better, the ump should of got 2 weeks for being a incompetent green maggot.

Hodge 2 weeks is a absolute disgrace, he could of snapped Chads neck. This tribunal is a joke!