TOPIC:

swan42 wrote:

58shark wrote:

swan42 wrote:

58shark wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: Footscray got 26, Fremantle got 11.

Not completely surprising BH. As I said our criticism of the WAFL umpires is equally applicable to the AFL ones.

Once again....FARK ME
Whinge, whinge, whinge. Hey, lets do away with all umps - get rid of the lot.

58S what did Nicnat get for his blatant stick the leg out and trip the player earlier this year? Perhaps you can tell everyone the last time the Eagles beat the Dockers.

Once again swan...RED HERRINGS! For God's sake, what the bloody hell has NicNat and Derby results got to do with your continual umpire whinging?

58s it is pretty simple with respect to NicNat's trip and what sanction he received. If he had been suspended then it would be reasonable to expect a suspension for Fyfe. The fact he got a fine for the same reason would indicate that Fyfe would receive a fine as well.

As for the comment about the Eagles' current record against the Dockers: it is a bit like the Newcastle song - any opportunity take it.

Yep, I remember the song - never let a chance go by (still got it on cassette ) Good to see you can make an attempt at jocularity

anchorman wrote: Funny , but I never mentioned the alignment. Time to let go Swan.
You are in strife when the multi named on is after you though. He is like a mongrel dog chasing a bone. But if you refer to him as multi or S&S he will not respond. Just a tip.

As much as you, A/man, and G Walton might want WAFL supporters, and despite assertions to the contrary it is not just me, to desist; we will continue to stridently oppose the prostitution of the WAFL through the host club alignment.

58shark wrote:

swan42 wrote:

58shark wrote:

swan42 wrote:

58shark wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: Footscray got 26, Fremantle got 11.

Not completely surprising BH. As I said our criticism of the WAFL umpires is equally applicable to the AFL ones.

Once again....FARK ME
Whinge, whinge, whinge. Hey, lets do away with all umps - get rid of the lot.

58S what did Nicnat get for his blatant stick the leg out and trip the player earlier this year? Perhaps you can tell everyone the last time the Eagles beat the Dockers.

Once again swan...RED HERRINGS! For God's sake, what the bloody hell has NicNat and Derby results got to do with your continual umpire whinging?

58s it is pretty simple with respect to NicNat's trip and what sanction he received. If he had been suspended then it would be reasonable to expect a suspension for Fyfe. The fact he got a fine for the same reason would indicate that Fyfe would receive a fine as well.

As for the comment about the Eagles' current record against the Dockers: it is a bit like the Newcastle song - any opportunity take it.

Yep, I remember the song - never let a chance go by (still got it on cassette ) Good to see you can make an attempt at jocularity

58S dare I ask: what is a cassette?

anchorman wrote:

swan42 wrote:

anchorman wrote: Funny , but I never mentioned the alignment. Time to let go Swan.
You are in strife when the multi named on is after you though. He is like a mongrel dog chasing a bone. But if you refer to him as multi or S&S he will not respond. Just a tip.

As much as you, A/man, and G Walton might want WAFL supporters, and despite assertions to the contrary it is not just me, to desist; we will continue to stridently oppose the prostitution of the WAFL through the host club alignment.

good for you Swan. But as I said I never mentioned the alignment.
But the wheels of the bus go round and round round and round and round and round.
Or there is a crack in the record the record the record.
Get over it Swannie old fella it will give you ulcers.

I repeat because Messrs A/man And Walton want this to go away, it won't until the host club is dumped. This has been the greatest prostitution of the integrity of the WAFL competition and those party to and supportive of the host club arrangement should hang their collective heads in shame.

BC wrote: one thing the alignments have done is unite your average WAFL fan which is a good thing. the one's I feel sorry for are your true blue (and black) EP supporters who don't accept or want the alignment which has ripped the heart and soul out of their club. if it was Subi who let the devil into the lair, I'd be bitterly disappointed. i don't feel sorry for Peel in any way shape or form as they shouldn't have been admitted into the comp in the first place.

well said BC, that is how I also see it.

swan42 wrote:

anchorman wrote:

swan42 wrote:

anchorman wrote: Funny , but I never mentioned the alignment. Time to let go Swan.
You are in strife when the multi named on is after you though. He is like a mongrel dog chasing a bone. But if you refer to him as multi or S&S he will not respond. Just a tip.

As much as you, A/man, and G Walton might want WAFL supporters, and despite assertions to the contrary it is not just me, to desist; we will continue to stridently oppose the prostitution of the WAFL through the host club alignment.

good for you Swan. But as I said I never mentioned the alignment.
But the wheels of the bus go round and round round and round and round and round.
Or there is a crack in the record the record the record.
Get over it Swannie old fella it will give you ulcers.

I repeat because Messrs A/man And Walton want this to go away, it won't until the host club is dumped. This has been the greatest prostitution of the integrity of the WAFL competition and those party to and supportive of the host club arrangement should hang their collective heads in shame.

The light in the beacon on the hill finally shined for you Swan when all this dawned, I always remember that post when you said " I thought the dockers were different, but now I realise they are just the same as the rest"

Just like Ben Chifley old boy the WAFL crew will continue to chase the light on the hill, its just you can see it now Swan.

Bazza wrote:

swan42 wrote:

anchorman wrote:

swan42 wrote:

anchorman wrote: Funny , but I never mentioned the alignment. Time to let go Swan.
You are in strife when the multi named on is after you though. He is like a mongrel dog chasing a bone. But if you refer to him as multi or S&S he will not respond. Just a tip.

As much as you, A/man, and G Walton might want WAFL supporters, and despite assertions to the contrary it is not just me, to desist; we will continue to stridently oppose the prostitution of the WAFL through the host club alignment.

good for you Swan. But as I said I never mentioned the alignment.
But the wheels of the bus go round and round round and round and round and round.
Or there is a crack in the record the record the record.
Get over it Swannie old fella it will give you ulcers.

I repeat because Messrs A/man And Walton want this to go away, it won't until the host club is dumped. This has been the greatest prostitution of the integrity of the WAFL competition and those party to and supportive of the host club arrangement should hang their collective heads in shame.

The light in the beacon on the hill finally shined for you Swan when all this dawned, I always remember that post when you said " I thought the dockers were different, but now I realise they are just the same as the rest"

Just like Ben Chifley old boy the WAFL crew will continue to chase the light on the hill, its just you can see it now Swan.

Bazza I have been singularly, unequivocally and unambiguously been strident in my opposition to the host club alignment. I believe G Walton is fully cognisant of my opposition to the host club alignment as well.