TOPIC:

Swandog wrote:

Freezin wrote: good to see SF take SD to the cleaners......hit whilst the iron is hot....SD are there for the taking.......no doubt with their depth SD will be back tho......must be one of the best and most comprehensive wins by SF over SD in a while.....for those who went are SD that bad and are SF that good?....on paper it certainly looks that way....kudos on the start.

Lets see how the March premiers go when you get a few injuries to key players, you might not finish last as I predicted but still wont finish any higher than 6th

Subi are top of the table..... so I guess you mean them?....surely they will finish higher than 6th Swandog..... .....fingers crossed Houghton comes back for ya then....

Freezin wrote:

Swandog wrote:

Freezin wrote: good to see SF take SD to the cleaners......hit whilst the iron is hot....SD are there for the taking.......no doubt with their depth SD will be back tho......must be one of the best and most comprehensive wins by SF over SD in a while.....for those who went are SD that bad and are SF that good?....on paper it certainly looks that way....kudos on the start.

Lets see how the March premiers go when you get a few injuries to key players, you might not finish last as I predicted but still wont finish any higher than 6th

Subi are top of the table..... so I guess you mean them?....surely they will finish higher than 6th Swandog..... .....fingers crossed Houghton comes back for ya then....

Wrong Freeze, Souths are on top

too true Leedy .....I guess that explains SD dismal performance on sat and Swandogs March premiers comment...thought it was just sour grapes TBH....surely Swandog isn't referring to EF as march premiers? ....though EF did beat a stronger SD than the one SF beat on the weekend....kinda see where Swandog is coming from......

Great effort by SF to win all 3 grades to.....looks like the reserves keep marching on and the colts side is back to where it was a year or so back.....though only early days I guess.
when does Zeph Skinner hit the park?

Freezin wrote: too true Leedy .....I guess that explains SD dismal performance on sat and Swandogs March premiers comment...thought it was just sour grapes TBH....surely Swandog isn't referring to EF as march premiers? ....though EF did beat a stronger SD than the one SF beat on the weekend....kinda see where Swandog is coming from......

Great effort by SF to win all 3 grades to.....looks like the reserves keep marching on and the colts side is back to where it was a year or so back.....though only early days I guess.
when does Zeph Skinner hit the park?

I reckon he is referring too last years 3-0 start to Souths season and not to pipe up as it all went to shit about this time last year

Swandog wrote:

Freezin wrote: good to see SF take SD to the cleaners......hit whilst the iron is hot....SD are there for the taking.......no doubt with their depth SD will be back tho......must be one of the best and most comprehensive wins by SF over SD in a while.....for those who went are SD that bad and are SF that good?....on paper it certainly looks that way....kudos on the start.

Lets see how the March premiers go when you get a few injuries to key players, you might not finish last as I predicted but still wont finish any higher than 6th

Sour Grapes lol, go worry about your own bunch of underperforimg cellar dwellers.

Grassy wrote: A bit like you Airbrushing another Club's History,eh?

Mate are you right in the head?

Grassy, any chance you can speak in more riddles or inuendo? No one has any idea what you're talking about.

SF had the alignment for a year. Then we pissed it off as it cost us a flag in our centenary. (Remember that year? It was your too but we knocked you out)

No one from Perth should ever pipe up . . ever . . . .over anything because you have done nothing in 40 yrs and you're about to whore yourselves out with all that is known for a long time.

RIP PFC.

Grassy, no one can work out wtf your going on about, but the facts speak for themselves re your clubs dismal history, no intellectual contortion act can change the fact that your clubs vote got peel into the comp, nor can it change your mobs hopeless performance for 30 odd years, in fact they are probably connected, voting peel in saved your mob from even more wooden spoons than you would of otherwise collected, maybe there was some method in the madness.

What was your mobs vote re the Eagles and Dockers?

Pfft, I have my facts right and the history books confirm it...perth voted peel in, you are just in denial about the ugly fact.

Now what was perths vote on wce and ffc?

So thats a yes yes and yes....i rest my case on your clubs farcical history on standing up for wafl....fark me drunk. On freo oval, nothing to do with us the council invited them there and gave them the land, not ours and never our call! Leaving now thank fark!