TOPIC:

Questioning the worth and the reasoning for having another?
Aren't all the others doing their job? How will the new agency operate. If the current watchdogs are not working, what makes bill think the new one will? Is the new agency going to take the others over or work with them or what? Too many unanswered questions still.

If Billy Shortman wants this watchdog, I’m wondering what he looks like in a striped suit?

And now Bill Shitman is crying over the "sensitive" government/cabinet documents that have been released by the ABC which state that he knew what the dangers were regarding his manic push to insulate every house on earth, costing 4 young lives in the process. He wants to sue the ABC, because he's been found out.

Senior Seagull wrote: And now Bill Shitman is crying over the "sensitive" government/cabinet documents that have been released by the ABC which state that he knew what the dangers were regarding his manic push to insulate every house on earth, costing 4 young lives in the process. He wants to sue the ABC, because he's been found out.

Wasn't that Rudd who was named in the document and he is the one threatening to sue?

yes it was mike...and didn't Krudd front a royal commission and say he knew nothing of the dangers of the scheme?

BC wrote: yes it was mike...and didn't Krudd front a royal commission and say he knew nothing of the dangers of the scheme?

Yep the RC was held and Krudd and Garrett gave evidence, Krudds rather unbelievable story was he was advised it was all good at the time , but as PM had to take responsibility for it, but was given false info.

the whole thing was one of the biggest scandals in national history, 4 people killed , 6 houses burnt down,

krudd and co should of face criminal charges for negligence but all wormed out of it.

Just for the record (and taken from here www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/...ort-in-cabinet-files

First, the cabinet document referred to by the ABC was given to and considered by the royal commission into the home insulation program by the Abbott government in 2014.

And having seen this document, and all other relevant cabinet papers, the royal commission concluded that there was no finding to be made against me, and in fact that while serving as prime minister ‘there was no warning given of the very many problems with the program (p.271 of the final report)’.

Second, the risks referred to in the cabinet document used in the ABC report refer to financial and administrative risks to the program for the commonwealth, not safety risks to workers.

“The ABC was told of these facts before publication. For these reasons, legal proceedings against the Australian Broadcasting have now commenced.”

Now, back to the Federal ICAC................................

Oops sorry guys yes it was that other labour wanker KRudd.
Phark me when you look at the rabble we have had to put up with as PM's from both sides of the fence in recent times, it could make a grown man cry ..... sorry and a grown woman cry, just to be PC.