TOPIC:

58shark wrote:

swan42 wrote:

58shark wrote: Rosco has to stay because if he does another runner, his public currency will be worth less than the Bolivian boliviano.

58s I would think you should be more concerned with what is happening in terms of the Eagles' coaches.

So you don't want me to post any comments on your beloved dockers?

I am a member of the Swan Districts Football Club. I have never been a member of Freo. I have watched one game Freo have played this year out of 21. I watched the first three or so minutes of the game today. They are not my "beloved Dockers". You can comment on whichever topics tickle your fancy.

However, I would think you would be more concerned about the failure of your team to make its presence felt in the top 8.

58shark wrote: Rosco has to stay because if he does another runner, his public currency will be worth less than the Bolivian boliviano.

But if he has a "big" gig to head too , in 5 years when his contract is up all will be forgotten

Time for Ross to go.

Tiger Tales wrote: Time for Ross to go.

TT what the host club alignment not working?

swan42 wrote:

58shark wrote:

swan42 wrote:

58shark wrote: Rosco has to stay because if he does another runner, his public currency will be worth less than the Bolivian boliviano.

58s I would think you should be more concerned with what is happening in terms of the Eagles' coaches.

So you don't want me to post any comments on your beloved dockers?

I am a member of the Swan Districts Football Club. I have never been a member of Freo. I have watched one game Freo have played this year out of 21. I watched the first three or so minutes of the game today. They are not my "beloved Dockers". You can comment on whichever topics tickle your fancy.

However, I would think you would be more concerned about the failure of your team to make its presence felt in the top 8.

To coin one of your phrases...."utter crap". Reading your past posts, you are a "closet" dockers supporter.

Geez Swan42 hardly a surprise that you want to refer every single conversation back to host club alignment. To be honest your comments have become boring.

It's time for Ross to go because the Dockers have failed to adapt their game plan which allows them to kick enough goals to win games. Are the Dockers in a better position now than when Ross arrived? No they are not.

58shark wrote:

swan42 wrote:

58shark wrote:

swan42 wrote:

58shark wrote: Rosco has to stay because if he does another runner, his public currency will be worth less than the Bolivian boliviano.

58s I would think you should be more concerned with what is happening in terms of the Eagles' coaches.

So you don't want me to post any comments on your beloved dockers?

I am a member of the Swan Districts Football Club. I have never been a member of Freo. I have watched one game Freo have played this year out of 21. I watched the first three or so minutes of the game today. They are not my "beloved Dockers". You can comment on whichever topics tickle your fancy.

However, I would think you would be more concerned about the failure of your team to make its presence felt in the top 8.

To coin one of your phrases...."utter crap". Reading your past posts, you are a "closet" dockers supporter.

I would have thought a supporter would actually watch the games of the team they support.

Tiger Tales wrote: Geez Swan42 hardly a surprise that you want to refer every single conversation back to host club alignment. To be honest your comments have become boring.

It's time for Ross to go because the Dockers have failed to adapt their game plan which allows them to kick enough goals to win games. Are the Dockers in a better position now than when Ross arrived? No they are not.

Frankly I don't care whether you think my posts are boring or not. And I will continue to point out the singular failure of the host club alignment especially when you analyse how poorly the Eagles have performed in the past two years.

swan42 wrote:

Tiger Tales wrote: Geez Swan42 hardly a surprise that you want to refer every single conversation back to host club alignment. To be honest your comments have become boring.

It's time for Ross to go because the Dockers have failed to adapt their game plan which allows them to kick enough goals to win games. Are the Dockers in a better position now than when Ross arrived? No they are not.

Frankly I don't care whether you think my posts are boring or not. And I will continue to point out the singular failure of the host club alignment especially when you analyse how poorly the Eagles have performed in the past two years.

Yawn

Ladder position is not an indicator of whether the host club/stand alone side model works. Fremantle are in 14th so you think it doesn't work. All Top 8 sides have aligned or standalone sides so does that mean that the model does work?

Tiger Tales wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Tiger Tales wrote: Geez Swan42 hardly a surprise that you want to refer every single conversation back to host club alignment. To be honest your comments have become boring.

It's time for Ross to go because the Dockers have failed to adapt their game plan which allows them to kick enough goals to win games. Are the Dockers in a better position now than when Ross arrived? No they are not.

Frankly I don't care whether you think my posts are boring or not. And I will continue to point out the singular failure of the host club alignment especially when you analyse how poorly the Eagles have performed in the past two years.

Yawn

Ladder position is not an indicator of whether the host club/stand alone side model works. Fremantle are in 14th so you think it doesn't work. All Top 8 sides have aligned or standalone sides so does that mean that the model does work?

No it doesn't. However what does count is that it is patently obvious that the supposed benefits to the two WA domiciled AFL clubs having the host club alignment in place is not successful. What is also patently and demonstrably obvious the significant damage to the integrity of the WAFL competition.