TOPIC:

Who can work out there way of handing out fines/suspensions, there is no system to the system.

Grassy wrote: Is it me,or is the AFL Tribunal/MRP System going Soft this year?

Moreso after Cotchin's Crude Jumper Punch on Lachie Neale was more than that and on face value,should have got 2/3 weeks for it,minimum!

Two things: they used the Judd defence when he elbowed Pavlich in the face - insufficient force. And Ballantyne is playing so they can't victimise him by victimising him in giving him a higher penalty than others for the same alleged action.

Grassy wrote: Is it me,or is the AFL Tribunal/MRP System going Soft this year?

Moreso after Cotchin's Crude Jumper Punch on Lachie Neale was more than that and on face value,should have got 2/3 weeks for it,minimum!

Spot on Grass man, Tommy Hawkins got suspended for his jumper punch, nowhere near the force of Cotchins.......$$$ finds mean jack, Cotch on what $500,000 a year and gets fined $1000. Its peanuts for em. Suspend em that will really hurt em, but they aint got the guts to do that. A disgrace

anchorman wrote: Looks like the MRP grew a couple this week Hawking can accept a weeks ban for his jumper punch.

Yup, being cats supporter, why this week??. The whack in the guts Cunnington did, that made a bloke double over go off the ground and dry wretch, funnily enough was fine, insufficeinet force i believer. Bl00dy joke is the mRP

Very good decision. I have always thought the jumper punch was a cowardly act. Hopefully they can rub it out (no pun intended)

58shark wrote: Very good decision. I have always thought the jumper punch was a cowardly act. Hopefully they can rub it out (no pun intended)

Ya know guys i have NO drama as such with Tommahawk being rubbed out, what i do have a drama with is that he has been rubbed out twice, YET i cant recall anyone else being rubbed out in the last cuppla years. Its the inconsistances that shyte me.

UNKA2 wrote:

58shark wrote: Very good decision. I have always thought the jumper punch was a cowardly act. Hopefully they can rub it out (no pun intended)

Ya know guys i have NO drama as such with Tommahawk being rubbed out, what i do have a drama with is that he has been rubbed out twice, YET i cant recall anyone else being rubbed out in the last cuppla years. Its the inconsistances that shyte me.

Fair enough, but the bar has now been set. Nothing less will be acceptable.

58shark wrote:

UNKA2 wrote:

58shark wrote: Very good decision. I have always thought the jumper punch was a cowardly act. Hopefully they can rub it out (no pun intended)

Ya know guys i have NO drama as such with Tommahawk being rubbed out, what i do have a drama with is that he has been rubbed out twice, YET i cant recall anyone else being rubbed out in the last cuppla years. Its the inconsistances that shyte me.

Fair enough, but the bar has now been set. Nothing less will be acceptable.

Alas bullocks 58, the bar has been set, BUT it will move depending on the offender and/or club ( gws afl lovechild). There are supposeldy "bar sets"in all MRP rulings, they are all bullocks.

Remember the ol "head is"sacrosanct"ruling?? or remember Judds elbow on pav, split above his eye, no penalty of course. They are a dead set joke, as i said dont care who it is or from which club.

Grassy wrote: No Penalty for Cunnington and Cotchin was a Joke.

That AWFULL Mob was big on head high stuff,but for some reason have gone cold on that.Be curious to know what the Report and Suspension Rate is of the 4 Clubs West of Nhill.

Check the hawks over the years, plenty of MRP reviews very few suspensions.

UNKA2 wrote:

58shark wrote:

UNKA2 wrote:

58shark wrote: Very good decision. I have always thought the jumper punch was a cowardly act. Hopefully they can rub it out (no pun intended)

Ya know guys i have NO drama as such with Tommahawk being rubbed out, what i do have a drama with is that he has been rubbed out twice, YET i cant recall anyone else being rubbed out in the last cuppla years. Its the inconsistances that shyte me.

Fair enough, but the bar has now been set. Nothing less will be acceptable.

Alas bullocks 58, the bar has been set, BUT it will move depending on the offender and/or club ( gws afl lovechild). There are supposeldy "bar sets"in all MRP rulings, they are all bullocks.

Remember the ol "head is"sacrosanct"ruling?? or remember Judds elbow on pav, split above his eye, no penalty of course. They are a dead set joke, as i said dont care who it is or from which club.

Unka2 apparently insufficient force. Would that have been the same year as he won the equivalent of the Sandover Medal?