TOPIC:

Grassy wrote: Checked West Coast and Fremantle's Draw ESPCIALLY for the rest of the season.

Neither play at that Dump called Etihad Stadium.

If anyone saw that vision of Lumps of Turf being Dug up Again,what a deadset Disgrace that playing is.

Whilst that happened through Scrums,there is NO Disputing the FACT that the Etihad surface is a Deadset Disgrace.

My question to Harris and Rosich Especially - Would you have allowed your players to play on it?

Why would you ask Harris and Rosich they don't make the decisions whether a ground is suitable or not that's the AFL's job like it was the WAFC job concerning Medibank.

While we're here have you come with any proof Peel wanted the game called off , no I thought so just you having an opinion about what you thought happened but really didn't.

Grassy wrote: Game transferred from Northam to Cunderdin.Are you lot(whoever you might be)sure you want to go a further 100 K's?

Game transferred from the Showgrounds to LEEDERVILLE(the irony).

Game called off at LEEDERVILLE,not just League but Reserves.Reserves cancelled,but League transferred to Subi Oval.

All 3 Fixtures with I common denominator.Peel or FREMANTLE,take your pick!Or the Football Commission.

3 Games transferred in a season,ALL involving Peel.

3 Games in a season?!Unprecedented!

It might have happened before,but not in decades I reckon.I just gotta check your fixtures to see which venue might have the Dummy spat out of the cot next!

Again no proof or actual quotes need a conspiracy thread for whacko's like you.

Grassy wrote: Are you flipping Blind?

That's up there,rright up your one eyed Snozz!

Just checking.It's just Freo you go for,isn't it?

You're not plugging for Peel instead of PERTH.

What do you reckon BC,a bit Pissweak?

Whatever way you cut it Peter,Peel,Freo and the WAFC,you're pretty much lumped into 1 Ugly Meatball.

Now,who does your side play next?

Old man yells at a cloud.

if you're so sure PN then why don't you call Schofield a liar? He was in discussions with FART before the Subi game and came straight out and accused Shepherd and the chunder FM of making the call to the WAFC. Once the dockers got involved where else could the WAFC go? Go ahead and call Schofield a liar if you're such a hero.

G don't disagree with PN - it becomes diatribe

BC wrote: if you're so sure PN then why don't you call Schofield a liar? He was in discussions with FART before the Subi game and came straight out and accused Shepherd and the chunder FM of making the call to the WAFC. Once the dockers got involved where else could the WAFC go? Go ahead and call Schofield a liar if you're such a hero.

Are you calling Shepherd a liar he's already stated Peel were following the WAFC directions , you support Subi of course youre going to believe Schofield , so far all you've got as evedence is what your senior coach has stated.

So who to believe eh like I said whatever supports you're narrative.

Time For a Flag wrote: G don't disagree with PN - it becomes diatribe

Lol here is the guy that doesn't rate Cam McCarthy, I'll take your opinions with a pinch of salt maybe 1/10

Peter North wrote:

BC wrote: if you're so sure PN then why don't you call Schofield a liar? He was in discussions with FART before the Subi game and came straight out and accused Shepherd and the chunder FM of making the call to the WAFC. Once the dockers got involved where else could the WAFC go? Go ahead and call Schofield a liar if you're such a hero.

Are you calling Shepherd a liar he's already stated Peel were following the WAFC directions , you support Subi of course youre going to believe Schofield , so far all you've got as evedence is what your senior coach has stated.

So who to believe eh like I said whatever supports you're narrative.

Shepherd had more to gain than Schofield from rescheduling the game in moving to a neutral venue and having Mzungu available...so who do you think would be a bit more frivolous with the truth?

Grassy wrote: Don't worry Peter.

Your Senior Side won't have to play at the Dome for the rest of the year,to put the AFL and the Stadium Management to the Test.

But your Reserves Team has a tricky decision or 3 to make.And your mates at the Commission.

As for Lyon,I would suggest he best be advised to choose his words more carefully,when it comes to his Club's Relationship with the WAFL!

I don't give a stuff what you think I said!

Of course you don't you've proven yourself to be a liar who manipulates what was said to suit your argument, you were caught out and made to look like an abosute flog.

BC wrote:

Peter North wrote:

BC wrote: if you're so sure PN then why don't you call Schofield a liar? He was in discussions with FART before the Subi game and came straight out and accused Shepherd and the chunder FM of making the call to the WAFC. Once the dockers got involved where else could the WAFC go? Go ahead and call Schofield a liar if you're such a hero.

Are you calling Shepherd a liar he's already stated Peel were following the WAFC directions , you support Subi of course youre going to believe Schofield , so far all you've got as evedence is what your senior coach has stated.

So who to believe eh like I said whatever supports you're narrative.

Shepherd had more to gain than Schofield from rescheduling the game in moving to a neutral venue and having Mzungu available...so who do you think would be a bit more frivolous with the truth?

Rubbish all three emergencies were going to play, And don't distance your club from Wart and Fart lol your club is up there with making this comp a sham.