TOPIC:

anchorman wrote: Number three done and dusted.Now we have three more of these games to come.Who made up the draw FFS.

I'm not too sure what you're referring to here Anchorman? Could you elaborate?? Maybe I've missed something.

anchorman wrote: Number three done and dusted.Now we have three more of these games to come.Who made up the draw FFS.

Dont the Top teams get the harder draws & the bottom Four get the softer draws?
Would have thought you had penciled in Gold Coast as a Gimme, especially at home.. Anyway there is always the round 20 DERBY.. JUST SOUR GRAPES

anchorman wrote: Put your mouth into gear with out thinking again LS.Still we all come to expect that.
You think that it is all about the Dockers.Such shallow thinkers.

Yeah I don't know how Leather Chaps thought your thread was about Freo, he should concern himself more with thiose drug cheats he follows.

anchorman wrote: That's the trouble with quite a few of the posters here PN, just because a Dockers supporter makes a comment about football in general they either think it is about the Dockers, or they try to make it out to be that we are talking about the Dockers.
Such narrow minded and short sighted people.Bitter and twisted old men who can't see beyond 1987.
Hopefully the new owners of the site will be able to attract some people to the site who can actually talk about the AFL and the WAFL in the right manner.Far too many old men who have no idea .

A/man some of us don;t agree with the current direction that the WAFL is heading. For example, in the last two WAFL GFs we have had the two lowest attendances since before the second world war. There were 964 attend a Claremont home game at Basso last week as another indicator of there is something extremely wrong with the WAFC's management of the WAFL competition. I certainly can discern the difference between the WAFL and Dockers/Eagles/AFL when it is appropriate. The vast majority of posters here are more interested, or their primary focus, in the WAFL and WAAFL competitions.

Anchor, in Leather's defence when you state "we" it would be fair to assume you are talking about Freo. Mikeh, likewise me, also wasn't clear what you were talking about....and of course PN found another thread to continue his obsession to post regarding anything even remotely related to Essendon....i'd even suggest his anti EFC obsession is more passionate than his support of his own club

Peter North wrote:

anchorman wrote: Put your mouth into gear with out thinking again LS.Still we all come to expect that.
You think that it is all about the Dockers.Such shallow thinkers.

Yeah I don't know how Leather Chaps thought your thread was about Freo, he should concern himself more with thiose drug cheats he follows.

You must have learnt the VIOLIN at a young age.. Get over it please

anchorman wrote: Richmond getting six, yes six Friday night games.What was the AFL thinking.

Thanks for that as you never mentioned. Just a little riddle. Note that North have 5 friday night & one thursday night games also.

Leather Stops wrote:

Peter North wrote:

anchorman wrote: Put your mouth into gear with out thinking again LS.Still we all come to expect that.
You think that it is all about the Dockers.Such shallow thinkers.

Yeah I don't know how Leather Chaps thought your thread was about Freo, he should concern himself more with thiose drug cheats he follows.

You must have learnt the VIOLIN at a young age.. Get over it please

Says the knob posting about Freo all the time that's called an obsession.

anchorman wrote: That's the trouble with quite a few of the posters here PN, just because a Dockers supporter makes a comment about football in general they either think it is about the Dockers, or they try to make it out to be that we are talking about the Dockers.
Such narrow minded and short sighted people.Bitter and twisted old men who can't see beyond 1987.
Hopefully the new owners of the site will be able to attract some people to the site who can actually talk about the AFL and the WAFL in the right manner.Far too many old men who have no idea .

Hey anchor, you guys are just as bad. As soon as someone says something negative about the dorks, you and your seagull mate are up in arms. I think some of the posts are aimed at getting your dander up!!

58shark wrote:

anchorman wrote: That's the trouble with quite a few of the posters here PN, just because a Dockers supporter makes a comment about football in general they either think it is about the Dockers, or they try to make it out to be that we are talking about the Dockers.
Such narrow minded and short sighted people.Bitter and twisted old men who can't see beyond 1987.
Hopefully the new owners of the site will be able to attract some people to the site who can actually talk about the AFL and the WAFL in the right manner.Far too many old men who have no idea .

Hey anchor, you guys are just as bad. As soon as someone says something negative about the dorks, you and your seagull mate are up in arms. I think some of the posts are aimed at getting your dander up!!

Well with any luck the new owner will put a stop to it after all he did mention it will be similar moderation to Bigfooty, tbh why should supporters have to put up with trolling especially from opposition supporters.

By all means have discussion but like you say if iits done to get people's dander up well that is trolling.