TOPIC:

anchorman wrote: Great news from the AFL today that the clubs who took Essendon players wont be allowed to top their playing stocks.
I think it is a great decision.They all knew the consequences and what was more than likely going to happen.

I disagree Anchor. I think it is an inconsistent decision in that why are the villians allowed to top up their list when the other clubs aren't. Essendon should have been forced to use their VFL team and that would have been fair. Don't forget also that Port Adelaide recruited Monfries before the drugs scandal broke.

The AFL is the only competition world wide that would let a club that's been found guilty of team doping to compete in 2016 , any other club would of been deregisted for the season, I laugh when I here the word integrity come out of the Gill and Fitzys mouth.

But hasn't Essendon agreed to pay Carlyles contract this season? That means they'll be paying others who are at other clubs now also.

Grassy wrote: The same Gil you confessed to worshipping,Peter?

Where have I confessed that?.

What are you on about A//M do you seriously think that posters aren't going to wander off topic on a footy forum, as far as I can see all posts on this thread relate to Essendon in one way or another., if you want to rule this forum with an iron fist I'd suggest that won't have worry about having a forum because no one will post here.

And no I don't think it's great news that the other clubs don't get top up players, why should Essendon get them and not other clubs imo if it's good enough for the drug cheats only fair that the other clubs are compensated, Essendon should of been made to use top up players from their VFL side.

Grassy wrote: That's fine Peter.Bang on all you want,about it here.

No problems with that.

How does it relate to Most supported WAFL Club?

I don't want to drag up any of your posts, but please don't tell me you don't wander off and talk about something completely irrelevant to the topic you are posting in, I reckon I could find a heap of you posts which are completely off topic.

Grassy wrote: There's plenty of other topics to discuss.

He can go on about ESSENDON here all he wants.That's find with me,whether I agree with him or not.

He might care to venture one or two opinions about PERTH for example,which I can't say I've noticed too much lately.What can done in his eyes to improve the Club's Onfield Fortunes.

I can talk about Essrndon on any thread i like mate if you don't like it stiff shit, the ignore function is your friend.

Grassy wrote: Fine.

My modus operandi is to now Bag Freo at every turn.Only out of spite to you mate.

I offered the Olive Branch,but you weren't in the slightest bit interested.

Here we go.

Fyfe to leave FREMANTLE at Season's end.

Hagdorn may have been right Afterall .

That's nice Grassy.

saw the title of this and was expecting to find out I had won lotto..

mikeh wrote:

anchorman wrote: Great news from the AFL today that the clubs who took Essendon players wont be allowed to top their playing stocks.
I think it is a great decision.They all knew the consequences and what was more than likely going to happen.

I disagree Anchor. I think it is an inconsistent decision in that why are the villians allowed to top up their list when the other clubs aren't. Essendon should have been forced to use their VFL team and that would have been fair. Don't forget also that Port Adelaide recruited Monfries before the drugs scandal broke.

I agree, WAFL clubs took on Essendon players AFTER the AFL had cleared them ( a joke of an investigation admititly ) nevertheless it was a Bona Fidie undertaken with clearance from the AFL and EFC, then the World body took action outside of the AFL findings, how can an innocent party like a WAFL club not feel agrieved?