TOPIC:

About time all those whinging about free kicks given against them did a check.
Fremantle have received 140 frees this year and 125 against.
Home games is 73 received and 46 against. Derby is 13 received and 20 against.
Interstate is 54 received and 59 against ( including 29 for and 15 against in Geelong)
Where is the BIAS. Usually home sides get a slight crowd reaction which benefits them marginally. Get over your TUNNEL VISION before you have a heart attack.

Leather Stops wrote: About time all those whinging about free kicks given against them did a check.
Fremantle have received 140 frees this year and 125 against.
Home games is 73 received and 46 against. Derby is 13 received and 20 against.
Interstate is 54 received and 59 against ( including 29 for and 15 against in Geelong)
Where is the BIAS. Usually home sides get a slight crowd reaction which benefits them marginally. Get over your TUNNEL VISION before you have a heart attack.

Why don't you worry about your cheating scum bag of a club you know how you reckon it was all over only to become Wada,s bitches.

Peter North wrote:

Leather Stops wrote: About time all those whinging about free kicks given against them did a check.
Fremantle have received 140 frees this year and 125 against.
Home games is 73 received and 46 against. Derby is 13 received and 20 against.
Interstate is 54 received and 59 against ( including 29 for and 15 against in Geelong)
Where is the BIAS. Usually home sides get a slight crowd reaction which benefits them marginally. Get over your TUNNEL VISION before you have a heart attack.

Why don't you worry about your cheating scum bag of a club you know how you reckon it was all over only to become Wada,s bitches.

What's the problem about Essendon. We got EIGHT free kicks against Fremantle. Did James complain?. If WADA finds we are guilty then we are BUT if WADA finds no case then we are INNOCENT. Any player who tests positive since Essendon self reported themselves is a complete dickhead.

Leather Stops wrote: About time all those whinging about free kicks given against them did a check.
Fremantle have received 140 frees this year and 125 against.
Home games is 73 received and 46 against. Derby is 13 received and 20 against.
Interstate is 54 received and 59 against ( including 29 for and 15 against in Geelong)
Where is the BIAS. Usually home sides get a slight crowd reaction which benefits them marginally. Get over your TUNNEL VISION before you have a heart attack.

Yep , its just a moronic victim mentality, they need to grow up.

LS...if WADA finds no case it doesn't mean the bummers are innocent..it just means there's not enough evidence to support a guilty verdict. the fact that there are no records detailing what was in hundreds if not thousands of injections is an indictment in itself.

Peter North wrote:

Leather Stops wrote: About time all those whinging about free kicks given against them did a check.
Fremantle have received 140 frees this year and 125 against.
Home games is 73 received and 46 against. Derby is 13 received and 20 against.
Interstate is 54 received and 59 against ( including 29 for and 15 against in Geelong)
Where is the BIAS. Usually home sides get a slight crowd reaction which benefits them marginally. Get over your TUNNEL VISION before you have a heart attack.

Why don't you worry about your cheating scum bag of a club you know how you reckon it was all over only to become Wada,s bitches.

And who is doing the whinging? are you lumping two or three on here as your proof that the majority of Freo supporters are whinging about umpiring.

And since you brought up Crowley at least Freo supporters acknowledge that he should cop two years unlike the StandByHird brigade.

BC wrote: LS...if WADA finds no case it doesn't mean the bummers are innocent..it just means there's not enough evidence to support a guilty verdict. the fact that there are no records detailing what was in hundreds if not thousands of injections is an indictment in itself.

LS of the two most likely scenarios:

(i) the players are found not guilty based on insufficient evidence as to what was in the injections; or

(ii) the players are found guilty because it is proved what were in the
injected.

I would suggest that the second is the more desirable as the players would be
aware or the health consequences of their injections. If it is the former then
the players will have no idea what could be the possible health consequences.

anchorman wrote: Just love to see you stop whinging about our whinging.

Irony is wonderful isn't it? This is a thread just designed to provoke reaction rather than meaningful discussion. Trolling is another word for it.

anchorman wrote: Yet another post heading off track with stupid comment.
But good to see that you are concerned about our health LS.
The issue was raised about ONE game, yes, ONE game. The figures and the facts were indisputable.

Indeed it was a/man, alas why pull just one game out of the bag, when it appears you guys have had a decent run for this season thus far?? they are also facts and figures.

swan42 wrote:

BC wrote: LS...if WADA finds no case it doesn't mean the bummers are innocent..it just means there's not enough evidence to support a guilty verdict. the fact that there are no records detailing what was in hundreds if not thousands of injections is an indictment in itself.

LS of the two most likely scenarios:

(i) the players are found not guilty based on insufficient evidence as to what was in the injections; or

(ii) the players are found guilty because it is proved what were in the
injected.

I would suggest that the second is the more desirable as the players would be
aware or the health consequences of their injections. If it is the former then
the players will have no idea what could be the possible health consequences.

yep I think it will be harder for them to get off via WADA, Swan I think the fact that the injections were given and the substance unknown may be enough.