TOPIC:

anchorman wrote: Will Jacko be welcome at Eagles headquarters after his failure to get either McKenzie or Priddis over the line for the AA team.
I thought that McKenzie was a bit more unlucky than Priddis. McKenzies certainly took some big scalps during the season. A tad unlucky.
I think Priddis had far too many better quality mids to beat.

He is more likely to be snubbed for his strident opposition to the prostitution of the WAFL competition through the host club alignment.

anchorman wrote: And the relevance to the topic here?

You posed the question whether he would be welcome due to the omissions. My answer is apposite to that observation. That won't be the reason he won't be welcome at the Eagles it will, if it occurs, be due to his strident and vocal opposition to the host club opposition.

anchorman wrote: I still fail to see the relevance to the subject of the post and your comment.
But what ever turns your motor on.

Let me put it this way: no he won't be snubbed because of the AA omissions. HOWEVER, his comments vis a vis the host club alignment would have caused a great deal of angst in Eagles' land.

I agree anchor ( ) Priddis had some very good mids up against him, but McKenzie was dead unlucky - should have been picked before Rance.

anchorman wrote: Will Jacko be welcome at Eagles headquarters after his failure to get either McKenzie or Priddis over the line for the AA team.
I thought that McKenzie was a bit more unlucky than Priddis. McKenzies certainly took some big scalps during the season. A tad unlucky.
I think Priddis had far too many better quality mids to beat.

Why ask such a silly question.? Jacko will always be welcome down at the west coast eagles as he is a DUAL PREMIERSHIP PLAYER, 92/94 something the dockers are yet to achieve. Has the window shut on the Dockers?
How is Clarke going a chance to be traded.

Hello Bazza the fuckwit is back

swan42 wrote:

anchorman wrote: Will Jacko be welcome at Eagles headquarters after his failure to get either McKenzie or Priddis over the line for the AA team.
I thought that McKenzie was a bit more unlucky than Priddis. McKenzies certainly took some big scalps during the season. A tad unlucky.
I think Priddis had far too many better quality mids to beat.

He is more likely to be snubbed for his strident opposition to the prostitution of the WAFL competition through the host club alignment.

Exactly my thoughts Swan when I saw the title of the thread, I thought that was subject matter..AA pfft..the award you celebrate when you have SFA to talk about,

Bazza wrote: Exactly my thoughts Swan when I saw the title of the thread, I thought that was subject matter..AA pfft..the award you celebrate when you have SFA to talk about,

I agree, I cant understand the logic of the subject. Glen is just one of many selectors, he doesn't pick it himself. And unless you were born yesterday, the subject isn't cause for a club to banish a favourite son. A seriously pointless subject. Must be a slow news day at the dockers there a-man?

I must admit I am a bit pissed off that McKenzie didnt get selected. I thought he was in the top 2 tall defenders this year easily.
Priddis was a bit unlucky but in saying that he was up against some tough opposition. I personally think he had a better year than Pendlebury and Boak. I also think that Sauce Jacobs should have been given the ruck duties.

McKenzie was very unlucky indeed, should have made it. Priddis maybe just not effective enough? Jacobs maybe a bit unlucky, hard to pick between him and Sandi they both have had a good season.