TOPIC:

I can't beleive the latest crap from the MRP. Ballantyne straight to tribunal. Franklin not mentioned. I don't believe Franklin should have been sighted, but what was the difference between the two. I can't figure out how they arrive at the decisions they make, there is no rhyme or reason. The game is called GayFL by the Kiwis, they are dead right its as camp as a row of tents.

Could it be that Port and Sydney play next week in Sydney and they don't want the main attraction out causing a further drop in crowd numbers?

JB wrote: Could it be that Port and Sydney play next week in Sydney and they don't want the main attraction out causing a further drop in crowd numbers?

Spot on JB, that is exactly the issue. Based on the precedent that this farce of a MRP set with the Nat Fyfe incident in the early part of the season, Franklin should have been cited. The fact that he wasn't and that Goodes wasn't cited a week or so ago proves that its more who you are and what team you play for rather than what you do is the primary consideration.

I heard on the radio that because of carry over points the penalty would be to harsh for the incident, they have referred it straight to the tribunal to get the appropriate penalty. Makes no sense what so ever but that's what they said.

anchorman wrote: Could very well be JB.
I am sure that Ballas would not be playing this week any way, but not good that he should be victimised in such a manner. We have to challenge any decision that comes down against him.

Did he pick up an injury yesterday A/M?

He got a severe cork in the arse, but he will be ok.

JB wrote: He got a severe cork in the arse, but he will be ok.

He'd be used to that wouldn't he????

Hey Shark, there are a few WC players who need a kick up the arse.

JB wrote: Hey Shark, there are a few WC players who need a kick up the arse.

Can't argue that other than to say that there's more than a few!!!

Hell get off piece of piss.