TOPIC:

58shark wrote: Dead set sick of this argument, but just to keep the Dorks going...
Now why did WCE re-sign NN on 800k?
a. because they like his hair and know he will need big bucks to maintain it? ..hmmm don't think so.
b. because they want him to be able to buy his family a new car and house? nah, not that either
c. because most of the other clubs were lining up to see if they were a chance to get him? yep...that would do it!
You dorks need to drop your blind hate for the WCE and look at things objectively

58 Snapper, the funniest thing about the 800k a year deal Nic Nat stitched up, was him coming out straight after saying he would have re signed for any amount. That's like putting your house on the market for 800k hoping to get 500k and some dill comes along and offers you 700k and think they've stolen it off you.

BTB I'll send the boys your regards

DD wrote:

58shark wrote: Dead set sick of this argument, but just to keep the Dorks going...
Now why did WCE re-sign NN on 800k?
a. because they like his hair and know he will need big bucks to maintain it? ..hmmm don't think so.
b. because they want him to be able to buy his family a new car and house? nah, not that either
c. because most of the other clubs were lining up to see if they were a chance to get him? yep...that would do it!
You dorks need to drop your blind hate for the WCE and look at things objectively

58 Snapper, the funniest thing about the 800k a year deal Nic Nat stitched up, was him coming out straight after saying he would have re signed for any amount. That's like putting your house on the market for 800k hoping to get 500k and some dill comes along and offers you 700k and think they've stolen it off you.

BTB I'll send the boys your regards

So following that arguement then obvioulsy Folua at a mill a year and like wise for Karmichael Hunt, was based of footy "talent" to 58?.
On footy ability shown thus far i reckon $400,000 tops.If other clubs were circling him sure the "marketability" would have been a huge reason as well 58

DD wrote: Well said JB, but my mate BTB is just a good shit stirrer. BTB, the problem with NicnNat mate is he refuses to play in front. How many marks does Dean Cox take in front? Shouldn't need a ruck coach, his team mate is one of the all time greats. If you give up the front spot in footy you hand the advantage to your opponent. If you play in front, especially being a ruckman, you will invariably win free kicks, especially with the chopping of the arms rule these days.

The big screamer over the back might win you mark of the year and win you one game out 20 but if you don't hang onto it you have no control from that point on. Football is a simple game if you just do the basics well.

Cant disagree with any of this. He has a good pair of hands on him, if he played in front when sitting in the forward line defenders would have a very hard time trying to beat him.

I would like to see him played at CHF where he can use his pace to attract the ball and be in front where he could mark the ball more efficiently. His recovery is excellent so he would have no problem doubling back all the time. He is just not working out his positioning around the ground so sticking him that area may go a long way to him working out the flight of the ball and positioning better. They badly need some weight in the guts, let Darling go there for a while.

What where you saying Anchor, let's hear your knowledgeable footy opinion once again. 3 cups you clown

Haha the old three cups it's like the little kid saying I got more marbles than you , you are flog Btb.
Back on topic give me Nicnat every day of the week over Zac I hope come at years end Clarke is put up for trade I still shudder at his performance in the 2013 gf.

Great game by Nic against Maric. Tore him apart. Didn't take a mark but a dominant game. Zac probably watched the match.

anchorman wrote: You are a FN moron.
Why wait until he has played two good games to make your moronic comments!!!!!!
The band wagon is well and truly on a roll now. They are coming out of the wood work.
I still don't think he took a mark last night though.

I would say he has had a better year than last year and from what I am seeing he is getting better each week. Would he fit into a top 4 team now W/man, or that right he is. What where you saying about those collingwood ruck again

Mr North 3 cups is something your club does not have, cobwebs and dust I would think. What does Fremantle keep in their trophy cabinet, a duster.

Before the Bounce wrote:

anchorman wrote: You are a FN moron.
Why wait until he has played two good games to make your moronic comments!!!!!!
The band wagon is well and truly on a roll now. They are coming out of the wood work.
I still don't think he took a mark last night though.

I would say he has had a better year than last year and from what I am seeing he is getting better each week. Would he fit into a top 4 team now W/man, or that right he is. What where you saying about those collingwood ruck again

Mr North 3 cups is something your club does not have, cobwebs and dust I would think. What does Fremantle keep in their trophy cabinet, a duster.

But but I've got more marbles than you lol.

Gents - I've seen btb on Perth Demon chats. Best to ignore.