TOPIC:

Correct. I have always thought Clarke would develop better than Naitanui. I think in the stats dept it would be quite even at the moment with Clarke better in kicks and marks, Naitanui leading in hit outs which he is very good at. They both tackle fairly well, Natainui possible a little better below the knees. At the end of the day one player knows how to get into position and the other doesn't and that is why Clarke will be a better player than Naitanui.

Well IMO a average player can be made to look better in a quality team. Unfortunately for nic nat he is surrounded by crabs. It is easier to play well in a team that is traveling well than one that has busted wheels. Put nic nat in a top 4 team and I would guess you would more than likely see a different player.

anchorman wrote: I don't think so BTB, unless you were watching the twos.At most top four sides he wouldn't be playing.

That is your opinion and you are entitled to it as I am mine. It was an example of in my opinion of how he would more the likely be a better player surrounded by quality team mates. At the moment he is surrounded by crabs.

anchorman wrote: Name me a team that he would be number two ruckman for in the top four or eight.
He may get games if the number one ruckman for the teams was out.

Collingwood!!!

anchorman wrote: Name me a team that he would be number two ruckman for in the top four or eight.
He may get games if the number one ruckman for the teams was out.

Gold Coast , Fremantle,

anchorman wrote: He would take over from Brody Grundy or Jarrod Witts!! I don't think so.

Yes anchor those two you just mentioned are setting the world on fire. By the way it was a IF he was in a quality team, nothing to do with those clubs would not play him or would not want him. How about we take Nic Nat back to west coast 2006 Premiership team, in that team you would more than likely see a different player IMO !!!!!!

Put it this way how do you think Sandilands would go in the west coast squad right now.

anchorman wrote: That is a stupid thing to say. The Eagles didn't really need a second ruk back then Cox did it all. He still would be in the two at Bassendean.

No need for that, in your opinion you feel he would not make the ducks league squad, Yeah right.

anchorman wrote: He would be the number one ruckman there.

He might be the number 1 ruckmen but how do you reckon he would fair playing with a bunch of crabs.

anchorman wrote: He would have been playing for Swans and not the Eagles is what I am saying.Back then he wasn't needed or wouldn't be needed.
No need for what!!

Your comment " stupid thing to say" you ask my opinion I gave it!!!!