TOPIC:

Noticed FOUR Richmond players fined for striking FOUR North Melb players last weekend. A couple rubbed out so far this year but TOO many striking & getting off with a pocket money fine. It's becoming a way to ensure you win the match.. These foul pricks deserve a RED card or suspension.. GUTLESS tribunal system.

And those thugs (in Richmond jumpers) at it again. Lynch only gets a fine.. AFL tribunal is GUTLESS. Anyway no one cares until their players are belted.

Lynch is a gutless lowdown sniper. As for Richmond, I used to like them till they started drinking their own bath water....now they’re just arrogant pricks. Would rather see Collingwood or Freo win the flag than them.

Lynch still at it. The weak prick cant control himself. Guess it's another $20 fine.. Hurley probably called him a WEAK PRICK & that set him off. Those other weak pricks were heard at the central bounce that they would penalize any more sniping with a free kick.. TOO LATE. Pay the FIRST ONE.

If they say, do that again and it’ll be a free kick, then obviously a rule has been broken and left unpenalised. So the rules are allowed to be changed during the game?

58shark wrote: If they say, do that again and it’ll be a free kick, then obviously a rule has been broken and left unpenalised. So the rules are allowed to be changed during the game?

There are rules for some certain players and then rules for the rest of them....not only in the afl but especially the WAFL as well. It is pathetic stuff from the umpiring fraternity who have their certain favourites but it never gets challenged from the hierarchy!

58shark wrote: If they say, do that again and it’ll be a free kick, then obviously a rule has been broken and left unpenalised. So the rules are allowed to be changed during the game?

Yup thats the reality TV show, that goes by the name AFL. All about ratings etc, in their (AFL) eyes, NOTHING else matters

Great to see that arsehole Lynch referred to the tribunal.

Leather Stops wrote: Great to see that arsehole Lynch referred to the tribunal.

Was that for his throat punch? If he’s been referred directly to the tribunal, surely he does a week. Mind you, he is one of the loved ones, so might just be told he’s naughty boy.

58shark wrote:

Leather Stops wrote: Great to see that arsehole Lynch referred to the tribunal.

Was that for his throat punch? If he’s been referred directly to the tribunal, surely he does a week. Mind you, he is one of the loved ones, so might just be told he’s naughty boy.

Most who go directly to tribunal get suspended