TOPIC:

Yep...I agree 58. I think I tipped them to make the 5 last year as well but you were cruelled by injuries and with Wiley on his last legs as coach didn't help either. I reckon if you can keep the bulk of your A listers on the park you should make the bottom part of the 5 imo….let's hope so anyway for the sake of your supporters..

I think EP may surprise a few, they have some good young players 20 to 22 year olds, starved of opportunities due to WC, these all have played in a colts GF 2016 and a Res GF 2018.
Should go alright

Perth
Subi
Claremont
Swans
South

Peel
WC
EP
EF
WP
I maintain that WC should be playing against the WAFL sides but in a different comp like the BHP cup. Same with Peel.

PS - Perth are on the March

So has it been decided whether WCE ressies can play finals? FWIW, I don’t think they should be allowed. They may come into the comp and finish low for the first couple of years, but once they get organized, they could become another Subi or Freo. Also, I don’t think peel/Freo should be allowed to play finals either. After all, what’s the difference between them and the Eagles reserves?

58shark wrote: So has it been decided whether WCE ressies can play finals? FWIW, I don’t think they should be allowed. They may come into the comp and finish low for the first couple of years, but once they get organized, they could become another Subi or Freo. Also, I don’t think peel/Freo should be allowed to play finals either. After all, what’s the difference between them and the Eagles reserves?

58 this is why they should be playing against us but in a different comp. The different comp could also have finals. I am really struggling why people don't understand my position.

Time For a Flag wrote: Perth
Subi
Claremont
Swans
South

Peel
WC
EP
EF
WP
I maintain that WC should be playing against the WAFL sides but in a different comp like the BHP cup. Same with Peel.

PS - Perth are on the March

WTF,Perth on the March.
What do you base that on?
Certainly can’t be our recruiting.

At this point if nothing changes re-our playing personnel it will be same old same old,no finals.

30plusyeardrought wrote:

Time For a Flag wrote: Perth
Subi
Claremont
Swans
South

Peel
WC
EP
EF
WP
I maintain that WC should be playing against the WAFL sides but in a different comp like the BHP cup. Same with Peel.

PS - Perth are on the March

WTF,Perth on the March.
What do you base that on?
Certainly can’t be our recruiting.

At this point if nothing changes re-our playing personnel it will be same old same old,no finals.

Got to say it gave me a bit of a chuckle, Perth did improve last year but still didn't make finals and I struggle to see how that would constitute them being 'on the march'.

Time For a Flag wrote:

58shark wrote: So has it been decided whether WCE ressies can play finals? FWIW, I don’t think they should be allowed. They may come into the comp and finish low for the first couple of years, but once they get organized, they could become another Subi or Freo. Also, I don’t think peel/Freo should be allowed to play finals either. After all, what’s the difference between them and the Eagles reserves?

58 this is why they should be playing against us but in a different comp. The different comp could also have finals. I am really struggling why people don't understand my position.

TFaF I understand your position completely I just don't agree with it. In my opinion your position would further the devalue the competition by have a side show that has little or no credibility.

just a different opinion.

Time For a Flag wrote: Perth
Subi
Claremont
Swans
South

Peel
WC
EP
EF
WP
I maintain that WC should be playing against the WAFL sides but in a different comp like the BHP cup. Same with Peel.

PS - Perth are on the March

WTF are you on?
Can I have some.
Talk about spaced out.

You don't need a prescription for positivity DF....but like negativity it comes Scot free.....good on TFAF for thinking big.....gotta start some where I guess