TOPIC:

Got a pleasant surprise when I noticed that Swans had risen off the bottom of the ladder without even playing, due to Perth's big loss. The challenge in front of the boys tomorrow is to try and stay off the bottom of the pile. Easier said than done but I'm sure the Ducks will give it a decent crack

Colts looking good at half time...some ordinary opposition thou...54-7

Cmon Swans.Everyone was shocked after the Claremont win last week.lets give Subi a run for there $$ today.

Good to see Subiaco's development system working so well, given another belting fot their colts team.

Then again why worry when you have unlimited resources to buy players and a WAFC that cannot control this farcical situation.

Before all the Subi trolls respond I did not agree with the way Swans did the same in 2009/10 and the financial turmoil that ensued.

Grassroots wrote: Good to see Subiaco's development system working so well, given another belting fot their colts team.

Then again why worry when you have unlimited resources to buy players and a WAFC that cannot control this farcical situation.

Before all the Subi trolls respond I did not agree with the way Swans did the same in 2009/10 and the financial turmoil that ensued.

Totally agree, we need to work a lot harder to get some better results. Having a small junior zone is no excuse we have to work with what we've got. We can't just sit back and rely on massive zone participation numbers to get results like Swans do, we have to do better.

Subi colts will be lucky to win a game this year going on what they had on the park today...can imagine Trent giving our boys a bit of a bake for a very lacklustre half pace second half effort but can understand it's hard to stay motivated for a whole game when the opposition is not up to it. Should have won by a lot more with inaccuracy in front of goal and too many getting ahead of themselves and kicking at goal from too far out.

Free kick count of 13 to 22 against Subi, therefore it's the umpires fault we lost the colts.

Theouterseagull wrote: Free kick count of 13 to 22 against Subi, therefore it's the umpires fault we lost the colts.

Always knew you were a swans man TOS

Dirty Weekender wrote:

Theouterseagull wrote: Free kick count of 13 to 22 against Subi, therefore it's the umpires fault we lost the colts.

Always knew you were a swans man TOS

Ha Ha
I suppose our guys can't get frees if they're nowhere near the ball

Try the EF v C league game free kick differential. Claremont duckers 27 v EF 14. We didn't lose because of this but because of Claremont's unbelievable record breaking goal front accuracy. Nearly all other stats such as disposals and shots on goal were even but to Claremont's credit they were very clinical with their disposal by foot.