TOPIC:

westaussieguy wrote: Very disappointing to put it mildly. Was hoping the score on the Wafl website may have been a misprint, West Perth put in a poor performance and now take no further part in the Finals.

Was always going to be hard mate with a stacked side.

Oh well that just leaves Sf to hold up the wafl flag next week.

westaussieguy wrote: Very disappointing to put it mildly. Was hoping the score on the Wafl website may have been a misprint, West Perth put in a poor performance and now take no further part in the Finals.

WAG,

Poor performance my arse, the boys played there rings out, unlike last week. 20 AFL players is a massive disadvantage, particularly in Finals with a GF as a incentive !!!

Bazza wrote:

westaussieguy wrote: Very disappointing to put it mildly. Was hoping the score on the Wafl website may have been a misprint, West Perth put in a poor performance and now take no further part in the Finals.

Was always going to be hard mate with a stacked side.

Oh well that just leaves Sf to hold up the wafl flag next week.

Good Luck Bazza

Leedy wrote:

westaussieguy wrote: Very disappointing to put it mildly. Was hoping the score on the Wafl website may have been a misprint, West Perth put in a poor performance and now take no further part in the Finals.

WAG,

Poor performance my arse, the boys played there rings out, unlike last week. 20 AFL players is a massive disadvantage, particularly in Finals with a GF as a incentive !!!

Yep, all understood Leedy. I know stats are not the be all of everything but noticed West Perth doing 61 Disposals/ Goal and an offence rate of only 10% in the first half of the match. Which does not give a good return. Mind you, I wasn't at the game and only saw the score when logging on.

Bazza wrote: [quote=Was always going to be hard mate with a stacked side. Oh well that just leaves Sf to hold up the wafl flag next week.

I will also wish South Fremantle good luck next week. As far as I know Hams will be back in the team.