TOPIC:

Winger wrote:

swan42 wrote:

anchorman wrote: What does it all mean!!! Is it a conspiracy that East Perth sold the most articles.
Maybe they are the most popular team in the competition.

A GF attendance of fewer than 12,000 spectators puts that hypothesis to bed FOREVER A/man.

What is particularly interesting is that article mentioned the 3rd top seller with no mention of the 2nd top seller. Why would a journalist do that?

I have attached the article.

Ross Lewis the Journo..say no more!!

Sf the 2nd top selling club.

Here is another theory. If a Perth supporter already had attended a WAFL game throughout the season and purchased a Perth jumper, why would they want to purchase another one?

Same can be said about other clubs. On a supporter/money ratio, I would say Peel did better than East Perth on the day.

I still can't understand why WAFL club merchandise does not come with the WAFL logo embroidery like AFL stuff. Surely the WAFC could cover the cost to clubs for having this added as part of the advertising budget.

Another example of the WAFL brand not being promoted, and yet another lost business/promotional opportunity.

But that would make SENSE Mike which the WAFC has absolutely no idea about unless it has the word NON in front of it!
All Grunt Duddington & his cronies have been worried about for the last 15 years or so is justifying their absurd decisions of Peel's existence, the Westar Rules fiasco, the alignment x 2 etc etc etc

MikeXU1 wrote: Here is another theory. If a Perth supporter already had attended a WAFL game throughout the season and purchased a Perth jumper, why would they want to purchase another one?

Same can be said about other clubs. On a supporter/money ratio, I would say Peel did better than East Perth on the day.

I still can't understand why WAFL club merchandise does not come with the WAFL logo embroidery like AFL stuff. Surely the WAFC could cover the cost to clubs for having this added as part of the advertising budget.

but that would be promoting the wafl! can't promote what the eagles and Dockers see as a rival business!
but that would be promoting the wafl! can't promote what the eagles and Dockers see as a rival business!

Another example of the WAFL brand not being promoted, and yet another lost business/promotional opportunity.

Beasley Hutton wrote: But that would make SENSE Mike which the WAFC has absolutely no idea about unless it has the word NON in front of it!
All Grunt Duddington & his cronies have been worried about for the last 15 years or so is justifying their absurd decisions of Peel's existence, the Westar Rules fiasco, the alignment x 2 etc etc etc

And I read today he (Dorro) wants to get back on the commission

Beasley Hutton wrote: But that would make SENSE Mike which the WAFC has absolutely no idea about unless it has the word NON in front of it!
All Grunt Duddington & his cronies have been worried about for the last 15 years or so is justifying their absurd decisions of Peel's existence, the Westar Rules fiasco, the alignment x 2 etc etc etc

And I read today he (Dorro) wants to get back on the commission

yeah Dorro said he wasn't too worried about the future of the WAFL.....either he is deluded and thinks the comp is safe.....or he really is only concerned about WCE and Freo running the comp to how they see fit!

I just wish Dorrington would stay retired and ride off into the sunset.
He stuffed up the WAFL enough in his time there.