UNKA2 wrote:
swan42 wrote:
58shark wrote: Not going to enter into long debate, but I simply cannot believe that people are wanting the idiots that financially strangled our country back in power. For shites sake, how short are their memories? I really have to laugh when I hear Shortman critise the Libs about their handling of the economy...God spare me....Bill your damned idiots nearly bankrupted us. As for Bishop, Labour hasn't anyone with her qualities and we could do worse than her at the head of the country.
You have got to be joking 58S. J Bishop was held in such high esteem that she wasn't good enough to become Treasurer. She also apparently needs to be chaperoned to the climate change conference in South America. It speaks volumes of how much T Abbott trusts her and values her abilities. Not that T Abbott should have any doubts about her loyalty; one must be extremely loyal to be able to deputy to 4 leaders.
Unka2 nice try but you are being totally disingenuous. The question is whether has broken his election promises made prior to the election. The answer is an unqualified, unambiguous and unequivocal YES.
The OVERALL question is do both labor/liberal, abbott and gillard both lie.? Could you please answer with a yes or no Swan42, Thank you.
the answer is of course YES Unka. All politicians lie. that is their job to lie. there is not a sane person on the planet that could dispute that.
And until the day comes when they present their Party promises to the public and have to sign a document that forces them to do what they say they will this will forever be the case.
That any person on the planet believes any party's policy speech is seriously deluded and has serious mental issues.
