TOPIC:

mikeh wrote: Heres a suggestion. Everybody has had their say about this ( several times in some instances). The discussion seems to be going around in circles. How about we get back to talking about footy?

It’s all about free speech mike.

58shark wrote:

mikeh wrote: Heres a suggestion. Everybody has had their say about this ( several times in some instances). The discussion seems to be going around in circles. How about we get back to talking about footy?

It’s all about free speech mike.

Yeah I realise that 58shark but if you go back through this thread, its just the same stuff being said over and over again by pretty much the same folk, some have made it bit personal (not you). Just seems a bit pointless but then again I can always choose not to read it which is what I will do from here on in.

The whole story is slowly disappearing. And any big new controversy will remove Ross and Freo from the front page like SPP a few weeks back.Unless Caro,Hagges.Gero can come up with something new.Ross had dodged a bullet here.Unless the Wafc do something about the 100k payout.

So far has been a big beat up. The media hate Ross because he treats them with the contempt they deserve. Who knows what happened now there's just been so many stories told and found to be fake news that it is wearing off. The media will have to make something else up to keep it going. Move on.

mikeh wrote:

58shark wrote:

mikeh wrote: Heres a suggestion. Everybody has had their say about this ( several times in some instances). The discussion seems to be going around in circles. How about we get back to talking about footy?

It’s all about free speech mike.

Yeah I realise that 58shark but if you go back through this thread, its just the same stuff being said over and over again by pretty much the same folk, some have made it bit personal (not you). Just seems a bit pointless but then again I can always choose not to read it which is what I will do from here on in.

Mike when a troll comes on a topic just attacking another opinion the troll needs to be dealt with. That troll on this thread is clearly Rookie draft. All others respectfully voiced differing opinions which is what a chat forum is about.

anchorman wrote:

gtrxuone wrote: The whole story is slowly disappearing. And any big new controversy will remove Ross and Freo from the front page like SPP a few weeks back.Unless Caro,Hagges.Gero can come up with something new.Ross had dodged a bullet here.Unless the Wafc do something about the 100k payout.

You mean something made up!!!The three you mentioned are better fairy tale writers than Aesopp.[

Aesop wrote fables.

58shark wrote:

swan42 wrote:

58shark wrote:

swan42 wrote:

MarkOlsen wrote: JB and swan42 - are you saying Ross Lyon is not involved in this ?

P
MO I can't speak for JB but I personally have seen no evidence to confirm that.

Swan, you are acting so naive on this. If it turns out that Ross has been avery naughty boy and caused your football club to spend $100k of member’s funds to protect him, will you hand your membership in as a protest?

58s I am very confused. I can't see any way that Swan Districts, even if they could afford it, would be required to pay $100k of member's (sic) funds. Perhaps MO can help me why Swan Districts would be involved; I certainly have no idea why Swans would be involved.

You’re playing cute swannie, as you do when asked a difficult question. Will you hand in your FFC membership???

58S please explain how I can hand in my FFC membership when I am not currently a member nor have I ever been a member of the FFC. In case you need me to repeat that: I have NEVER BEEN A MEMBER OF THE FFC.

Haven't heard anything about this media witch hunt since the press conference last week, I thought there was a video tape of the incident.

Time for the media and people the get on to the next thing to be outraged about , what a weird society we live in.

you could look at it another way - whoever leaked the story to the media got the outcome they wanted - an AFL coach outed for an incident that cost his club a large sum of money and people wont forget that.

Once again you are assuming the media got it right. So far there is no evidence that this is the case.