Notice: Undefined variable: ub in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 53

Notice: Undefined variable: ub in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 65

Deprecated: strripos(): Non-string needles will be interpreted as strings in the future. Use an explicit chr() call to preserve the current behavior in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 65
Welcome, Member
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC:

Question time for Bomber. 10 years 9 months ago #20634

  • Dirty Weekender
  • Dirty Weekender's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 2484
  • Thank you received: 374

anchorman wrote: Two days have been set aside for ASADA to question Mark Thompson about his part in the substance scandal.He has hired a lawyer for the enquiry.
The pressure goes up now.


If his body language on AFL 360 is anything to go by he's deep in the brown stuff. My gut feel is not good with regards to Bomber

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Question time for Bomber. 10 years 9 months ago #20642

  • Dirty Weekender
  • Dirty Weekender's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 2484
  • Thank you received: 374

anchorman wrote: I get that feeling as well.He seems very uncomfortable when asked questions about it.


Geelong have had one of the biggest bodied sides in the modern era. I can't but help connect the dots. Hope I'm wrong

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Question time for Bomber. 10 years 9 months ago #20694

  • UNKA2
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 1800
  • Thank you received: 116

Dirty Weekender wrote:

anchorman wrote: I get that feeling as well.He seems very uncomfortable when asked questions about it.


Geelong have had one of the biggest bodied sides in the modern era. I can't but help connect the dots. Hope I'm wrong


obviously didnt see the eagles 92 84 then matt barber ring a bell??

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Question time for Bomber. 10 years 9 months ago #20696

  • Dirty Weekender
  • Dirty Weekender's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 2484
  • Thank you received: 374

UNKA2 wrote:

Dirty Weekender wrote:

anchorman wrote: I get that feeling as well.He seems very uncomfortable when asked questions about it.


Geelong have had one of the biggest bodied sides in the modern era. I can't but help connect the dots. Hope I'm wrong


obviously didnt see the eagles 92 84 then matt barber ring a bell??


Funny u mention that UNKA2 was talking about that comparison tonite at work. Them Eagles were big boys in 92-4 that's 4 sure.

Not that it's related in anyway except for time frame but in 91 coming thru the colts system I was offered access to steroids on numerous occasions. Not gonna grass on anyone here but I personally know a couple of players who did partake and ended up playing in WAFL premiership sides later in their careers. One can only assume it was happening at the next level as well during this period.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Question time for Bomber. 10 years 9 months ago #20710

  • 30plusyeardrought
  • 30plusyeardrought's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 2153
  • Thank you received: 102
Ahhhh whats a footy topic without UNK mentioning the Eagles...does he ever comment on an actual football game???
Whilst you are ringing the bell UNK tell me other than Jackovich (and he wasnt that huge at that early stage of his career) who were the other Eagles players that were "extra" big bodied in that 92 side????
Below is a couple of pictures to help ya out!! Compare these with a photo of the then 1992 Geelong team...tell me the difference!!







Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by 30plusyeardrought.

Question time for Bomber. 10 years 9 months ago #20818

  • 58shark
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 5176
  • Thank you received: 553
You gotta remember 30ypd that our old mate unk relives 92 & 94 every day of his life...that's why he's so obsessed with the Eagles.
2x25= Seinor and Michael = 1xBrian Peake

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Question time for Bomber. 10 years 9 months ago #20867

  • UNKA2
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 1800
  • Thank you received: 116

58shark wrote: You gotta remember 30ypd that our old mate unk relives 92 & 94 every day of his life...that's why he's so obsessed with the Eagles.


Nahh 58 thats so "last century" actually pre 2000!. Just trying to balance the debate, as always.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Question time for Bomber. 10 years 9 months ago #20869

  • UNKA2
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 1800
  • Thank you received: 116

30plusyeardrought wrote: Ahhhh whats a footy topic without UNK mentioning the Eagles...does he ever comment on an actual football game???
Whilst you are ringing the bell UNK tell me other than Jackovich (and he wasnt that huge at that early stage of his career) who were the other Eagles players that were "extra" big bodied in that 92 side????
Below is a couple of pictures to help ya out!! Compare these with a photo of the then 1992 Geelong team...tell me the difference!!











Gee what a good idea. Hey why not compare a photo of a 1970's side againt the 92 eagles and compare.? Bodies have got bigger as time has gone on. Wasnt the eagles weight coach in those days "pinged" for steriods (or something like that). Matt Barber i think.
I'll comment on games if ya like... eagles have lost most of thier games at home so far this year.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Question time for Bomber. 10 years 9 months ago #20871

  • UNKA2
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 1800
  • Thank you received: 116

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Question time for Bomber. 10 years 9 months ago #20872

  • 30plusyeardrought
  • 30plusyeardrought's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 2153
  • Thank you received: 102
obviously didnt see the eagles 92 84 then matt barber ring a bell??

Thats what you posted,so why wouldnt we compare 2 grand final teams of 92??????,why would you suggest a side of the 70's...fool!
You suggested we look at the Eagles 92 and 94 teams after a poster suggested Geelong players looked a bit sus.
C'Mon put ya money where your mouth is....look at the bottom pic tell ua all who there looks out of the ordinary and like a big bodied hulk???

Shit if that what was in the "age" it must be true!
Its got me stuffed how that article or the West Coast Eagles has anything to do with this thread and its lead title "Question time for Bomber"?????????????????????

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by 30plusyeardrought.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

Search

Keyword

Who's Online?

We have 508 guests and one member online

  • mikeh

Newest Footy Recruits

  • Donaldgrosy
  • Robertloano
  • Eddieskago
  • Lost WAFL
  • Duncs1977