TOPIC:

What was everyones thoughts on the WAFL lift out in todays West ? The Ferals have been pumped up and marketed well once again. My boys are destined for the bottom 3 going by those clowns called critics, may happen, will wait and see.

Leedy wrote: What was everyones thoughts on the WAFL lift out in todays West ? The Ferals have been pumped up and marketed well once again. My boys are destined for the bottom 3 going by those clowns called critics, may happen, will wait and see.

Thank goodness there is something significant in the paper about the WAFL. Thought they had given us the flick completely for a while.

I reckon West Perth are top 4 material.

Can't believe none of those tipsters put Peel any higher than 6th.

They can keep pumping East Perth and Peel as much as they like! It won't bring record attendances to either clubs home matches.

Peels side still looks crap and they will get the spoon as for EP plugging Johnson and their dud FF being the best in the comp their list is still wafer thin cos most of the listed guys with any talent won't suit up.

I doubt if anyone of you guys actually read it seriously or else you would have commented about the amount of mistakes and omissions in this magazine.Firstly looking thru the AFL listed players for each team i noticed Murray Newman had been demoted and was in the Swans Wafl listed players.Maybe they are anticipating his delisting already.Another off putting thing for me was the lack of consistency in where they listed afl rookie players.East Fremantle's were listed in the AFL section but most others were listed in the Wafl list of their club with a asterisk.Callum Sinclair was listed in Subis Afl listed players but with no asterisk denoting that he is a rookie.Finally i wanted to check on players games and when i went to see how many games Swans new Perth recuits Elari and Rogers had played it told me none the same with Mark Seaby.Obviously all players games for previous teams do not count or they are too lazy to do any research.It would have been nice if they could have done a more professional job.

Is the WAFL magazine liftout? Which paper was it in? Today's - Thursday?

dogman wrote: Is the WAFL magazine liftout? Which paper was it in? Today's - Thursday?

Wednesdays mate, on the cover yet again they have pumped up the Roygals like Ross Lewis and co do every year!

chaddy22 wrote: I doubt if anyone of you guys actually read it seriously or else you would have commented about the amount of mistakes and omissions in this magazine.Firstly looking thru the AFL listed players for each team i noticed Murray Newman had been demoted and was in the Swans Wafl listed players.Maybe they are anticipating his delisting already.Another off putting thing for me was the lack of consistency in where they listed afl rookie players.East Fremantle's were listed in the AFL section but most others were listed in the Wafl list of their club with a asterisk.Callum Sinclair was listed in Subis Afl listed players but with no asterisk denoting that he is a rookie.Finally i wanted to check on players games and when i went to see how many games Swans new Perth recuits Elari and Rogers had played it told me none the same with Mark Seaby.Obviously all players games for previous teams do not count or they are too lazy to do any research.It would have been nice if they could have done a more professional job.

Yep I was hating how so many players had 0 games played against their name. And before anyone says i am being unfairly critical, ask yourself if it happens in the AFL (vfl)

Cheers Swandog, I managed to snare one at my local newsagents. Saw the EP crap on the cover . . . as always.

HOW CAN YOU GET A HANDLE ON THE STRENGTH OF A CLUB WHEN THEY CAN'T BE BOTHERED TO GIVE YOU A CORRECT INFO ON GAMES PLAYED