TOPIC:

Barney wrote: They have a few umpires on the panel taking questions, can think of a few on here who should have come.

Why Barney? Could they perhaps explain how Schloithe received almost 40 frees more than anyone else or why Worobec is so bad?

They did explain why the umpiring department has run a 50 year vendetta against Swan Districts. It was a very thorough summary that included graphs and pie charts. Your name came up at least seven times in the discussion. It was extremely compelling and received a standing ovation. Some were left in tears while an old lady got up and hugged Daryl Sinclair.

Now that Barney has had his attempt at humour, did anyone go to the footy forum last night and can provide a summary of what was said with respect to the WAFL competition. Thanks.

Barney wrote: They did explain why the umpiring department has run a 50 year vendetta against Swan Districts. It was a very thorough summary that included graphs and pie charts. Your name came up at least seven times in the discussion. It was extremely compelling and received a standing ovation. Some were left in tears while an old lady got up and hugged Daryl Sinclair.

Speaking of D Sinclair, when I spoke to him he said that there were four WAFL clubs' supporters who thought they got the rough end of the umpiring. The clubs were in alphabetical order: Peel, Perth, SUBIACO and Swans. Feel free to comment Barney.

Barney wrote: They did explain why the umpiring department has run a 50 year vendetta against Swan Districts. It was a very thorough summary that included graphs and pie charts. Your name came up at least seven times in the discussion. It was extremely compelling and received a standing ovation. Some were left in tears while an old lady got up and hugged Daryl Sinclair.

Damn I always thought the 50 year vendetta was against South, especially in Derbies.

....Barney are those pie charts, bar graphs etc in colour or black & white?

42..... when you said 4 WAFL club supporters I thought you were actually referring to (1)BH, (2)Swandog, (3)MO and (4) your good self? .......but not too sure you could include Peel.....have they got any supporters?....let alone 4!!

I looked at the transcript of the event on WA Today, sounded like it was all 99% AFL gump about umpiring and interpretation of rules,,,boring as batshit,

Barney wrote: They did explain why the umpiring department has run a 50 year vendetta against Swan Districts. It was a very thorough summary that included graphs and pie charts. Your name came up at least seven times in the discussion. It was extremely compelling and received a standing ovation. Some were left in tears while an old lady got up and hugged Daryl Sinclair.

hahaha...nice one barney.

swan42 wrote:

Barney wrote: They did explain why the umpiring department has run a 50 year vendetta against Swan Districts. It was a very thorough summary that included graphs and pie charts. Your name came up at least seven times in the discussion. It was extremely compelling and received a standing ovation. Some were left in tears while an old lady got up and hugged Daryl Sinclair.

Speaking of D Sinclair, when I spoke to him he said that there were four WAFL clubs' supporters who thought they got the rough end of the umpiring. The clubs were in alphabetical order: Peel, Perth, SUBIACO and Swans. Feel free to comment Barney.

You've spent all year saying umpires can't be trusted now you want us to believe what they say?

www.6pr.com.au/blogs/6pr-perth-blog/futu.../20140911-3fauk.html
worth a listen
What i make of this
WCE FFC play party line on alignment
Big Ron has no love loss with WAFC-no chance to run new stadium
Sinclair-wast of air time
Raponi-Calling WAFC to task over finance